It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Quarantine
Originally posted by RomanMaroni
reply to post by Quarantine
Osama Bin Laden was and still is the "key factor" to understanding what happened that day. Minutes after the first tower was hit, the media ran rampant with news of Bin Laden masterminding attacks on America. This is cut and dry. Khalid Sheik Mohammad was far from an innocent party and quite possibly may be more guilty than Bin Laden himself, however this is how it was presented to the people. This is the "official story". This is what people believe. This is what our kids will learn in history class one day, goodluck changing it.
Originally posted by Quarantine
Tell me the truth about what happened September, 11th 2001. The only truth you can give me is the fact that Osama Bin Laden masterminded a terrorosit attack on America and succeeded. It may sound far out, but investigators have yet to prove otherwise.
If 9/11 was "an inside job", prove it.
Originally posted by Quarantine
Tell me the truth about what happened September, 11th 2001. The only truth you can give me is the fact that Osama Bin Laden masterminded a terrorosit attack on America and succeeded. It may sound far out, but investigators have yet to prove otherwise.
If 9/11 was "an inside job", prove it.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jesus_is_fake
1) the united states was attacked
Well we know.
1. The United States had lots of warnings that somehting was going to happen and did nothing to stop it.
Originally posted by Cowgirlstraitup7
To the OP, you come in here stating what you know to be fact. And this is your solid belief. So why then are you asking us to prove anything to you, it's obvious that you don't want to know anything but what's already in your own mind.
"The great enemy of the Truth is very often not the lie - deliberate, contrived, and dishonest - but the myth - persistent, persuasive and realistic." -John F. Kennedy
a number of people, we'll call them conspiracy theorists here, are so overwhelmed by the pain and blow to their ego because we were hit in our own back yard that they spin fantastic, implausible, scientifically unsound and generally nutty theories of other things it could have been and would rather beleive ...
Originally posted by jackinthebox
So why is it then, that a person such as myself, who saw the Towers burning with my own eyes, accepted the official story for quite some time? Is it my ego and my emotions that changed my mind in recent years, or the lack of facts and outright lies to support the official version of events?