It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HarmoniusOne
Originally posted by magickalworld
There were a bunch of quakes off the coast of Honshu, Japan yesterday; that may be the activity that all the sites are picking up....They have been having hundreds of aftershocks.....Magick
Thanks Magick. I had seen that but I'm having a hard time with the concept that a M 6.9 could show up all over the world. Even a M 9 in Japan shouldn't show up on the other side of the planet unless perhaps it was related to volcanic activity *and* all the places it showed in were volcanic *and* the magma could carry the vibrations from the quake. Does anyone know if this is even theoretically possible? I know that Mt Fuji is near Honshu but it doesn't seem to be related to the quakes.
Earthquakes with magnitude of about 2.0 or less are usually call microearthquakes; they are not commonly felt by people and are generally recorded only on local seismographs. Events with magnitudes of about 4.5 or greater - there are several thousand such shocks annually - are strong enough to be recorded by sensitive seismographs all over the world. Great earthquakes, such as the 1964 Good Friday earthquake in Alaska, have magnitudes of 8.0 or higher.
Originally posted by magickalworld
This is right from the USGS website:
Earthquakes with magnitude of about 2.0 or less are usually call microearthquakes; they are not commonly felt by people and are generally recorded only on local seismographs. Events with magnitudes of about 4.5 or greater - there are several thousand such shocks annually - are strong enough to be recorded by sensitive seismographs all over the world. Great earthquakes, such as the 1964 Good Friday earthquake in Alaska, have magnitudes of 8.0 or higher.
Ya wouldn't think....
Thanks for clearing that up for me. I'm actually a little relieved.
Originally posted by otlg27
Val:
I don't suppose you have long and lat points for all the quakes this year. Being a bit of a database master (no, I'm not talking about Access, I'm talking real DBs), it might be fun to throw all that data into a database.... who am I kidding on second thought:
Do you know where I can get long and lat and magnitude numbers for earthquake for say the last 10-20 years in an easy to read (aka text) format to toss into a database and see if we can get some neat shtuff as a result of some hardcore analysis?
Osiris
Originally posted by Valhall
The Quake Analysis has been updated through 12/15:
Quake Analysis