It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by chise61
Also look through Midnight DStroyer's posts he lists a lot of good info...
1. Is the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) an organization within the U.S. Department of the Treasury?
Answer: No. The IRS is not an organization within the United States Department of the Treasury. The U.S. Department of the Treasury was organized by statutes now codified in Title 31 of the United States Code, abbreviated “31 U.S.C.” The only mention of the IRS anywhere in 31 U.S.C. §§ 301-310 is an authorization for the President to appoint an Assistant General Counsel in the U.S. Department of the Treasury to be the Chief Counsel for the IRS. See 31 U.S.C. 301(f)(2).
At footnote 23 in the case of Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979), the U.S. Supreme Court admitted that no organic Act for the IRS could be found, after they searched for such an Act all the way back to the Civil War, which ended in the year 1865 A.D. The Guarantee Clause in the U.S. Constitution guarantees the Rule of Law to all Americans (we are to be governed by Law and not by arbitrary bureaucrats). See Article IV, Section 4. Since there was no organic Act creating it, IRS is not a lawful organization.
2. If not an organization within the U.S. Department of the Treasury, then what exactly is the IRS?
Answer: The IRS appears to be a collection agency working for foreign banks and operating out of Puerto Rico under color of the Federal Alcohol Administration (“FAA”). But the FAA was promptly declared unconstitutional inside the 50 States by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of U.S. v. Constantine, 296 U.S. 287 (1935), because Prohibition had already been repealed.
In 1998, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit identified a second “Secretary of the Treasury” as a man by the name of Manual Díaz-Saldaña. See the definitions of “Secretary” and “Secretary or his delegate” at 27 CFR 26.11 (formerly 27 CFR 250.11), and the published decision in Used Tire International, Inc. v. Manual Díaz-Saldaña, court docket number 97‑2348, September 11, 1998. Both definitions mention Puerto Rico.
When all the evidence is examined objectively, IRS appears to be a money laundry, extortion racket, and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951 and 1961 et seq. (“RICO”). Think of Puerto RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act); in other words, it is an organized crime syndicate operating under false and fraudulent pretenses. See also the Sherman Act and the Lanham Act.
Originally posted by XXXN3O
reply to post by sizzle
I was interested to know as it would make things such as war extremely profitable for countries by killing off more people to line there pockets faster. It also might account for a lot of other things that have happened in the past that have no apparent gain.
I certainly think its possible as the rabbit hole never seems to stop getting deeper. I have not came across anything that gives details of this sort of thing existing. Any thoughts on where I can look?
I opened a thread not too long ago on Kennedy's Iron Mountain Report. You do not necessarily need to refer to my thread, you can google "Iron Mountain Report.' There is much controversy as to whether it was a hoax.
I suggest that everyone read it for themselves and decide. It is truly an eye-opener and lines up with a lot of what we are seeing today.
I highly recommend it.
[edit on 17-5-2008 by sizzle]
Originally posted by therainmaker
How does the USPS compare to the 'Fed? Similar things? I was once told the USPS is a company of sorts, or some kind of contractor.
US Constitution: Article 1, Section 8, Clause 7 -- Powers of Congress
To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;
Originally posted by therainmaker
For that matter, how do IRS FINCIN agents get their authority?
3. By what legal authority, if any, has the IRS established offices inside the 50 States of the Union?
Answer: After much diligent research, several investigators have concluded that there is no known Act of Congress, nor any Executive Order, giving IRS lawful jurisdiction to operate within any of the 50 States of the Union...
Originally posted by therainmaker
...I mean I know I am not alone, but how come the People let it get this bad?
Originally posted by XXXN3O
What are we to do about it?