It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Neon Haze
Buddhists, Monasticism, and Christians are all brainwashed into believing what they have been led to believe.
However, it is not true that they are satisfied with less. Each and every one of the above however misguided they may be seek truth and freedom.
Even with misguided thought and brainwashing, people still seek truth and freedom.
You are wrong about JFK. He was the only president who turned his back on the cancer when he was confronted with it.
Originally posted by Anti-Tyrant
Perhaps you should compare that to a man who loses a member of his family (like a son), to a man who loses his dog.
Can you explain how the have here has stood to lose more than the have not?
Originally posted by Neon Haze
If I may interject....
if you only had £10 and you needed it all for fuel to get to work and you lost £1.. it may mean you have to walk part of the way...
If you had £100 and lost £10 the cost of fuel is the same so you would be able to get all the way.
If I had 865 Million Pounds then I would not be concerned so much about my everyday living...
You have to HAVE to HAVE MORE... If you have not then you have to be very very very lucky to HAVE...
Anyone who says that there was not an element of luck in thier success is a fool.
Originally posted by logician magician
If they are misguided then there must be some absolute truth. You must know it as you say they are misguided. Please inform us all of your absolute wisdom. How can we be guided?
False. He was trying to foster a country of selfless individuals and reconcile them with those who believed in a hard monetary system in order to bridge the gap between selflessness and Hard American ideals. He was trying to merge America with international selfishness - the very core of the NWO. Movie Star. Charisma.
Think about the "Space Race" between the two superpowers - United in a competition for the betterment of humanity. For technology. For Science. For Understand.
JFK was the classic beginning of the NWO.
Yet, it wouldn't matter for the ignorant theorist who proposed proposterous suppositions to prey on the mind of the ill-informed misguide unintelligent follower of inexperience.
Such as your "865 million pounds" that you have to have more of. If you want you lineage to be a have, then I suggest that you selflessly work for your progeny as men of past have.
Originally posted by logician magician
1) What? Are you serious?
You can't actually argue the points, so you introduce nonsense?
2) What is your reference point here?
Have-not loses his son = tradgedy
have-not loses his dog = oh no
Have loses his son = tradegy
have loses his dog = oh no
3) Care to explain?
Originally posted by Anti-Tyrant
Originally posted by logician magician
If a man with $100 loses $10,
is it not the same feeling to a man with $10
who loses $1?
They've both lost 10% of their net worth. Is $1 to a to a billionaire the same as $1 to a homeless man?
Can you explain how the have here has stood to lose more than the have not?
Perhaps you should compare that to a man who loses a member of his family (like a son), to a man who loses his dog.
Can you explain how the have here has stood to lose more than the have not?
Originally posted by Dark Crystalline
reply to post by logician magician
Your first sentences (Like all the others after it) are those ones which are bringing your ultimate failure and that's why I'm waiting to see you crash and burn. You're not a noble, not an elite. You never was. You just believe that you're one, because you have money. Your inner spirit makes you noble and elite. But you're never going to understand this, because with this behavior you presented that you're too blind and moron to see this and you believe that your elitist behavior may save you from anything. I can tell you, not. Where from I know this? Because I'm one of the noble, elite rebel who is going to kick your and your kind's ass out from the planet, even from the galaxy alone if it's necessary.
You cannot control me. You cannot control others. Do you believe because I'm reading your stuff, I'm your puppet? Naive one. That's not meaning that you can control me. If you believe in this, you're a fool. You cannot buy peace, you cannot buy truth, you cannot buy love and foremost, you cannot buy the guardian spirits. If it's old fashioned to you, I really looking forward of your end and I'm really eager to see as you crash and burn in the flames of your foolishness. The Guardians of the planet will stop all of your plans. The elitists knows this and fear it. Fear from those ones that they believe they can and are controlling. That's where you're mistaken. And unlike the elitists, we have back up.
Originally posted by logician magician
No. The have-nots are incapable of seeing it. It is your nature to revolt against the order of the world. It is your nature to be selfish.
We, as the monetary and intellectual elite
We have given you government support and social programs to receive a higher education and to balance the line between us. We attempt to provide you with unemployment, with welfare, with unemployment searches, with tax breaks, and we outright force your children to get at least a high-school education.
You claim that taxes are a fraud.
Apparently, that does not sit well in the selfish minds of the have-nots.
Originally posted by Draves
Personally I am afraid of the have-nots and you should be too because if the world goes to crap, guess who they're gunning for?
Originally posted by Anti-Tyrant
I intend to target those who refuse to settle down and plan out their actions - the ones who will be marching through our cities, looting, plundering, raping, killing as they go.
[edit on 26-4-2008 by Anti-Tyrant]
Originally posted by logician magician
We, as the monetary and intellectual elite of the world have come to an agreement some time ago. We have given you government support and social programs to receive a higher education and to balance the line between us.
Originally posted by Anti-Tyrant
reply to post by Draves
That we would sell our time in order to pay our taxes and earn a living seems... sadistic, in a way.
Almost as if there were some sort of shadowy being at the heart of our society, laughing as he enjoys the things he has.
Originally posted by Neon Haze
By not stating I am right and you are wrong.
By looking further back in history than what we are taught to.
By leaving the comfort zone of an after life and acceptance of your mortality.
By Learning to Love not because we are told it is the way and the light but because it is what makes us who we are.
Always do the Greater good, not matter what.
That was why he got to be the President... He was killed because he did not play ball....
Without being presented with a choice human kind will create opportunity and choices. Success is built on failure and experience. The inexperienced will learn more from direct experience than from teaching.
I have Children and I work for their future, that doesn't mean that I am able to amass a vast amount of money for thier future.
What's more is anyone who is simply given vast sums of money on reaching 18 their life is set you would have thought. But what does that teach someone in experience??
Originally posted by Anti-Tyrant
1) If you think expanding the boundaries of the discussion beyond that of mere financial matters to be nonsense, then yes.
2) My reference point is that i was using a situation outside of finances, and seeing as you appear to be unable to comprehend why i would do that, i'll do things your way;
Like i said, there is no shared nature between the have and the have-nots, but i attempted to explain why by bringing in a matter outside of finance with the 'man and his dog' comparision.
It doesn't matter whether the man is rich or poor, if he loses his son he will suffer, and the same goes for the dog to a lesser extent.
But the thing is, it is not only the man who will suffer - if he has a wife or other children, they may also suffer.
Same goes for losing the dog.
Which is an example of those who have not suffering because the man who had lost.
blah..blah..blah..
Whereas a man who had, for example; a few hundred thousand, could quite easily hire a taxi (or two).
3) If you think that all i have stated is nothing but nonsense, then why exactly should i bother?
Originally posted by chiponbothshoulders
This thread was started with psycho rabble,and that is where it will keep going.
I really do not understand what the point of the opening post was,it seems more to me,by the punctuation and word order,to have been started by a high school kid.
A "have not" been edumacated very well person.