It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Slayer
Christians need to stop shoving their beliefs and opinions down peoples throats.
Originally posted by McGotti
I would say that the Christians are attempting to take over the world.
Dude they never attempted that lol..what are you thinking????
THEY ALREADY DID TAKE OVER THE WORLD!!!!!!!
Originally posted by Agent47
It would be the first step to cleaning up the moral decline of our society, last year the FCC received a record 2.5 millions complaints due to TV, and if people thought that beefing up the FCC's abilities to punish vulgarity would result in the loss of the first amendment I dont think there would be such a public praise for what happened to howard stern. I dont agree with puting labels on CDs and Video Games but I do think TV is far to unregulated by mega corporations, so I think in short, your wrong.
Originally posted by KrazyJethro
The point is is that YOU people feel that free reigh should be given to all who would like to speak.
Not on the public air waves. But why you ask?
Some CHOOSE not to want that availible to their kids.
Sexual/violent/obsene material is a personal choice and should be made one. If people want to see/hear it, then they should be allowed to, but people who do not should not have to.
Choice is the word here.
Originally posted by McGotti
These Christian Rights groups annoy the hell out of me. They run the FCC and just about any thing that deals with censorship. They run the whole government!
This is true and dont dare dissagree with them lol cause you will be branded a satanist.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Clear Channel canned him, not the government. Tha tis not censorship.
It has long been the FCC's job to ensure that the "Freedom of Speech" was exercised with the responsibility that goes with it, but it has not done its job for many years. Cleaning filth up is not censorship, that is decency.
Originally posted by DjNothing
But concepts of "decency" and whatever else are fine. I hold nothing against a person or group of people for believing that one thing or the other is "decent" or "moral" or whatever. But those concepts are very different from person to person.
Censorship is just wrong, and the 'cleaning up' of the airwaves is just another way of saying that some people are so uptight with their own views on the world that they cant stand to think that anybody else feels different.
Wrong, these are public airwaves, which means that no choice comes into play, all can access it. In public standards, the highest moral value must be applied
Its like me saying that since I hate Cheeseburgers, then nobody should be able to sell cheeseburgers. I wouldnt want my children wandering into one of those cheeseburger selling establishments, with all their talk of cheeseburgers, and burgers with cheese.
This arguement is fallacious, because the purchasing implies consent. There is no problem with purchasing porn, for instance, but as we see it is covered in plastic for those who do not wish it to be visible to all people. Does this hamper one's right to the porn should they want it? Not at all.
By the way, I love cheeseburgers, but hopefully you get my point.
..and Im nobodys Sidekick. If anything I'm Batman and He's Robin
Originally posted by KrazyJethro
It's not the government's job to regulate for the welfare of the general public?
Seems to me that the Constitution says that it does.
The Christian population of this country is about 189,983,000 out of 290,809,777 which is roughly 65% of America. I guess they don't matter.
There is no problem with freedoms here. People can say what they like, but there is a difference between what is said by a person, and what is broadcast into people's homes.
Originally posted by Hillbilly
Personally, i despise the very idea of anyone or any group telling me what I should or shouldn't hear. Aren't these the same kind of groups that want to ban guns, smoking, drinking, and fast food?
Now, I will agree that tv and radio do need to be regulated in a way. But be practical. Why not seperate the channels and stations according to content?
We have channels that are nothing but sex or violence and so on, why not do the same for radio? (personally, I think Howard should be able to stay on the air) Why not put all so-called "offensive" radio on their own staions?
Imagine this...you tune into "WFUK, All offensive, all the time"
And I don't buy that garbage about tv violence causes kids to be violent, thats caused by bad parenting. Japan has more sex and violence on tv than we do and they have a lower crime rate.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
If you were to do any study of the nation, pal, you'd be really pissed off. You'd find that the nation was founded on Christianity.