posted on Feb, 25 2004 @ 11:01 AM
In following the unfolding story of Dan Burisch (
www.stealthskater.com... ), I came across this GLP post by Bill Hamilton
(
valhalla.iscg.net... ) :
*******************************************************************
skywatcher22 12/17/2003 10:17 am EST
Food for thought... Not the 'Raven' posting here...
Quoth The Raven: "One of the first surprises from Raven was the existence of an Ultra Top Secret group called the OROCA Panel, a panel, which had
been in existence since the '50s. The panel is above MJ-12 and meets at CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia in a SCIF (Sensitive Compartmented
Information Facility) room underground at Level 3. The existence of this Level 3 itself is highly classified. In fact, it is bypassed when accessing
other underground levels...
A Very Brief Quote From The "Einstein Notes": Project Jehovah...."The qualitative picture is a local field of positive cosmological constants
contributing to the local metric field in a small boundary layer around the skin of the craft. The layer was controlled by the E & M brainwave of the
pilot. The pilot has a Q* type of field. Dr. Einstein expanded....... The fuselage of the craft was more liken to a high temperature superconductor
to which the occupants do not feel the g forces at high accelerations or sharp turns. There is a direct correlation to mind-linkage via headband and
hand-panels. There is an exotic field surrounding the vehicle. The hull has super-conducting capabilities and properties.....
0800/23/6/52/EODCI/DSC/OSI/E"
The untold story of Einstein's involvement is one of the biggest yet and hopefully will be revealed one of these days. Einstein worked with
Oppenheimer and was contracted to the Navy to help with the physics. Einstein had "contact".
*******************************************************************
Personally, I don't think the ET craft are that "simple" (even though advanced cocmpared to our current technology). The above doesn't explain
the morphing or MQTing (I'm thinking "artificial reality soliton bubbles" here). But who am I to question this? My personal opinions are just
'that' -- and I yearn to be "corrected". Like everybody else on these communities. But not with abstract theories and equations. But by
something that can be reproduced in a laboratory. Something that I can SEE and TOUCH!