It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MatrixProphet
Believe it or not...there are many different types of individuals on ATS with many different beliefs. Not all are Christian!
You can believe in anything you choose to believe in, ie, the easter bunny, Santa Claus or the truth fairy, any of the Hallmark holidays. It does not matter one whit to me.
My approach as I have said countless times is; to uncover those who are also searching for truth outside of religion. I along with others are leaving the middle man out (religion) and are wanting an HD (High Definition) relationship with Jah without the middleman's influence.
There is just nothing new in what all of you Christians say and teach, and it is not enough. There are no new arguments as you all have displayed so conscientiously. It becomes a lot of arguing and debating with information that has been argued and debated for many more years than you have been alive.
In all of my threads I have not heard even one post that has displayed any new intelligence from any religious person, it is all the same ritualistic dogma. My threads actually are created to help one to think! Whether one agrees or not!
Note: so I don't have to continually repeat this, I am going to cut and paste this to my other threads.
Originally posted by MatrixProphet
reply to post by idle_rocker
I understand your anger. I would point you to the situation Jesus was in before his death. Did he respond to the Sanhedrin, to the high priest or did he remain quiet? I use this example considering the fact that you are Christian. Please remember that this is a Conspiracies in Religion Forum, if it is too upsetting for you I would avoid this forum. I am not the only one challenging religion.
There comes a point where it is no longer wise to try to talk to an angry person or crowd.
What I am saying is very obviously upsetting you. I would recommend ignoring my posts and avoiding my threads. Thank you.
Look, I don't pretend to have all the answers. That's why I'm asking questions. But before I can believe your story, I have to know it has legitimacy. That's why I'm testing. Does that make more sense?
Jah (Yah) is often used as a shortened form of the name Jehovah or Yahweh. Thus, the term Hallelujah would mean "Praise Jah
In the original text of the Hebrew Bible, "Jah" occurs 26 times alone and 24 times in the term "Hallelujah."
It is transliterated "Jah" in a single instance (Psalm 68:4) in the King James Version of the Bible, and An American Translation has "Yah" at the same place. The Jehovah's Witnesses' New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures contains "Jah" 50 times in the OT and four times in the book of Revelation. The complete Tetragrammaton is not always rendered as Jehovah.
Source
Elohim has plural morphological form in Hebrew, but it is used with singular verbs and adjectives in the Hebrew text when the particular meaning of the God of Israel (a singular deity) is traditionally understood. Thus the very first words of the Bible are bre# bara elohim, where bara ברא is a verb inflected as third person singular masculine perfect. If Elohim were an ordinary plural word, then the plural verb form bar'u בראו would have been used in this sentence instead. Such plural grammatical forms are in fact found in cases where Elohim has semantically plural reference (not referring to the God of Israel). There are a few other words in Hebrew that have a plural ending, but refer to a single entity and take singular verbs and adjectives, for example בעלים (be'alim, owner) in Exodus 21:29 and elsewhere.
In most English translations of the Bible (e.g. the King James Version), the letter G in "god" is capitalized in cases where Elohim refers to the God of Israel, but there is no distinction between upper and lower case in the Hebrew text.
Source
Originally posted by MatrixProphet
Whether they are aliens or gods - time will tell!
Originally posted by MatrixProphet
The interesting aspect of your point is this; what if the time is now?