It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Israel Owns 82 Nukes!!!

page: 1
0
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 22 2004 @ 08:55 PM
link   
This will have a huge impact on the war on terror . . . Drudge is reporting that SECRET DEFENSE REPORT SHOWS ISRAEL OWNS 82 NUKE WEAPONS

[Edited on 23-2-2004 by John bull 1]



posted on Feb, 22 2004 @ 08:57 PM
link   
This has been a well known fact for years. Israel has had nuclear weapons for a long time but the number has never been verified. Hell we sold em some of the stuff to build nukes. Thats the reason behind the fact that there hasnt been a major middle eastern war since 76. Sorry bud but your behind the curb.



posted on Feb, 22 2004 @ 08:58 PM
link   
US has thousands of nukes.... So what?



posted on Feb, 22 2004 @ 08:59 PM
link   
Uhhhh, and?



regards
seekerof



posted on Feb, 22 2004 @ 09:00 PM
link   
Fomr the same article, this is more frightneing...


China�s nuclear ICBM force will grow from forty missiles to as many as 220. Rivals Pakistan and India will more than double their nuclear stockile. Stalinist North Korea may have ten atomic weapons by 2020. Israel will maintain an arsenal of about eighty warheads. North Korea posseses not only two to four nuclear weapons - of limited nuclear yield - but it also has an offensive biological and chemical arsenal. Says the DIA report, "Despite limited intelligence on the status of its biological warfare capabilities, North Korea is thought to have developed agents including anthrax, plague, cholera and toxins."


A bunch of paranoid rabid nutcases with nucs is a bad senario....

As for Israel I suppose thats what their subs do, carry the nukes around... otherwise they all could be taken out with one blast.



posted on Feb, 22 2004 @ 09:02 PM
link   
The balance of power is the same as it has been for the past 20 years. Only change was when the DPRK created its stockpile. The nuclear players out today are the same that have been around for a while.



posted on Feb, 22 2004 @ 09:03 PM
link   
palistine is lucky that isreal hasent brough those babies into the game yet.



posted on Feb, 22 2004 @ 09:04 PM
link   
Actually thinking of the spin, lies and disinfo spread from the Whitehouse in the last few years how much credence are we to attach to this information?

It may be as much BS as Iraq's WMD....



posted on Feb, 22 2004 @ 09:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by Netchicken
Actually thinking of the spin, lies and disinfo spread from the Whitehouse in the last few years how much credence are we to attach to this information?

It may be as much BS as Iraq's WMD....



Do you know what your talking about? These facts arent the first to come out, these statistics are well established facts known to all intelligence agencies across the globe. It wasnt like bush just dropped these facts and this is the first time any of us have heard of it. Take a Foreign Relations course sometime, you learn a lot.



posted on Feb, 22 2004 @ 09:07 PM
link   
I don't know about you guys and gals, but here of late, these "secret reports and documents"....like the one from the Pentagon on climate...........:
"Secret Report will humiliate Bush!
The Pentagon now tells Bush: climate change will destroy us!"

www.abovetopsecret.com...

............are starting to get waaaaay out of hand and amounting to BS.
Israel's nuke and nuclear capacities have and are well known:

"Israel's Nuclear Weapons Program
Last changed 10 December 1997"

nuclearweaponarchive.org...

Drudge needs to seriously 'tighten up".




regards
seekerof

[Edited on 22-2-2004 by Seekerof]



posted on Feb, 22 2004 @ 09:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Seekerof
I don't know about you guys and gals, but here of late, these "secret reports and documents"....like the one from the Pentagon on climate...........:
"Secret Report will humiliate Bush!
The Pentagon now tells Bush: climate change will destroy us!"

www.abovetopsecret.com...



............are starting to get waaaaay out of hand and amounting to BS.
Israel's nuke and nuclear capacities have and are well known:


seekerof


See ladies and gentlemen thats how you do it. Hats off to someone who knows whats hes talking about.



posted on Feb, 22 2004 @ 09:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by Agent47
Sorry bud but your behind the curb.


Well thanks for making me feel like a dumbass. I was just trying to post what I THOUGHT TO BE NEWS!

[Edited on 22-2-2004 by Bushed]



posted on Feb, 22 2004 @ 09:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by Bushed

Originally posted by Agent47
Sorry bud but your behind the curb.


Well thanks for making me feel like a dumbass. I was just trying to post what I THOUGHT TO BE NEWS!!!

All of the self-proclaimed new it all fu



posted on Feb, 22 2004 @ 11:07 PM
link   
Nothing shocking here, really.

I wonder how many of those nukes are US-made?



posted on Feb, 22 2004 @ 11:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by KrazyIvan
palistine is lucky that isreal hasent brough those babies into the game yet.

Yea that would be a great plan, "Hey you get off our land or we'll nuke you!" That would be the most pointless military move ever.



posted on Feb, 22 2004 @ 11:34 PM
link   
At risk of sounding ignorant, why is it ok for Israel to have nukes but not Iraq?

*tongue firmly in cheek*



posted on Feb, 22 2004 @ 11:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by tatjna
At risk of sounding ignorant, why is it ok for Israel to have nukes but not Iraq?

*tongue firmly in cheek*

First off Iraq so far does not have any... and Israel is our ally in the middle east for obvious reasons: oil. And if you scroll up and read that we gave most of the technolgy and supplies to build them their nukes



posted on Feb, 22 2004 @ 11:46 PM
link   
Yes. Apparently Iraq's imaginary nukes are more dangerous than Israels' American-supplied real ones.

And of course the burning question in my mind is "Which leader is the most volatile anyway?"



posted on Feb, 22 2004 @ 11:49 PM
link   
I would feel safer if Saddam had Nukes than Ariel Sharon and Israel having them... Israel is the most corrupt nation and they wouldn't have any influence anywhere if the USA didnt back them...

F-U-C-K!!! Israel



posted on Feb, 22 2004 @ 11:54 PM
link   
with my tongue in my cheek as well, why shouldn't Iran be allowed to have nukes either? I mean, heck, those mullahs only chant death to israel every other second, you never know what will happen if they actually get a nuke. (perhaps death to Israel?). And who knows, they are after all a supporter of terrorist orgs like hezbollah, whom I am sure would love to get their hands on a thermal nuclear device. Iraq, w/Saddam, wasn't actually much different.

specialasianX: you're kidding, right?



[Edited on 22-2-2004 by Bob88]



new topics

    top topics



     
    0
    <<   2  3 >>

    log in

    join