It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What if Jesus was what you would call gay?

page: 6
0
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 24 2004 @ 06:35 PM
link   
hamilton, i somewhat understand your view and i think you understand mines.

In some religions namely Hinduism, "God" the ultimate creator, made both female and male incarnations of himself (that's how you get the multiple gods of hinduism) some of those gods and goddesses created other gods, but It is still "ONE GOD", who simply shows himself in a multitude of ways in order to reach his people in the ways that would best fit their needs and culture. It is the Same One God of the Bible, The Koran and other religious writings.

little of topic here, but I know you are bit of a Christian radical in your own way (no offence)


But I don't understand why people can't accept different versions of the one hidden ultimate truth without knocking someone's else's opinion, beliefs or religion in the manner that most seem to do....but that is one of the ultimate questions is it not? Why do people feel they have the right to judge others instead of simply just judging themselves.

GOD, the ONE GOD, is everything, he is beginning and end, good and bad, he is black, white and every color in between, he is all, he male, female, and whatever you can think of that is in between. If it lives, then GOD created it, therefore GOD is everything including Gay.



posted on Feb, 25 2004 @ 12:08 AM
link   
i wouldn't call micromarius a christian radical.
i would just call him a cool dude or far out.
or real close in same difference



posted on Feb, 25 2004 @ 11:43 AM
link   
I'm definately not a radical Christian. No more than Jesjuah was a radical Jew. Jesjuah was infact extremely orthodox. The reforms he demanded stll haven't come. And those demands were that only the Torah should be recognised as the Law of God, not like the Pharicees then and still practise; that the Talmud and all the other Levitical additions to the Covenant should also be held in such regard. The astrology of Jesjuah is also contrary to the Babylonian astrology the Pharicees then and still practise.

If you don't understand this, then neither do you understand know why Pilate washed his hands and what consequences this had for the planned redemption of the Jews, how the Talmudian Jews couldn't be saved, since washing hands was done as a sign of cleanness as ordered by the Talmud, thereby their own folly stated that Pilate was sinless and clean, something which made him entitled to receive the blessing of the sacrifice instead of the Jewish nation. When the crowd screamed "Let his blood come uppon us and our children" they did so because they hoped to receive this blessing it is to be sanctified in the Blood of the Lamb. But they won't get it, unless they throw away the Talmud and thereby removing the law saying Pilate was clean and sinless. For Pilate was as unclean as a dog is unclean and he has so much innocent blood on his hands it would be impossible to clean it off. He is thereby unworthy of preparing and executing any holy sacrifice. However, the sacrifice was unholy in itself, for the human body is unclean in itself. Killing a man is like killing a dog. It's pathetic and useless. Pilate is thereby nothing better than a filthy dogkiller (and no I am not saying here that Jesjuah was a dog, but the Law demands that sacrificial animals should have split hooves and must chew the cud). Pilate was like the Highest Priest of Molok and the Sanhedrin was like a family letting their firstborn "walk through the fire". Unholy bloodwhores all of them.

If you don't understand these things, you simply don't know who Jesjuah is and what he fought for and against. You cannot understand why he died for all of us and neither can you understand what the Name of YHWH (which is translated the Name of Jesus) is, which is said to be the only way to redemtion. It's YHWH astrology and sound prophecy in the Name of YHWH, contrary to Ba'al astrology in the Name of Marduk (another name of Ba'al) who was noone else than Nimrod it seems. The guy who built the "Tower of Babel", known as the 666 Zodiak.

Blessings,
Mikromarius

[Edited on 25-2-2004 by Hamilton]



posted on Feb, 25 2004 @ 02:23 PM
link   
ok wrong choice of words, you're not a Christian radical, but you are still a radical in your own right.

Your take on religion, the Bible and Jesus has been extremely confusing to me. I understand many things that you have pointed out, but still many are just way over my head...what is the name of your religion?

just curious mikro, I am trying to understand you and your posts a little better.



posted on Feb, 25 2004 @ 08:20 PM
link   
I am familiar with Jesjuah and try to find out what he stood for, so I could easier identify his real enemies living today. If Jesus or Jesjuah which is the name I use lived today, he would probably be on the hitlist of every decent security agency. That's the problem the world is facing today. It the thing the world has become it's own enemy, it's inhabitants are like grasshoppers.

It looks as if all this world wants to do is to deliberately misunderstand and believe cheap lies and smart evations, in order to justify their own repulsive lives and their particular group's general social desires.

Blessings,
Mikromarius

[Edited on 25-2-2004 by Hamilton]



posted on Mar, 28 2007 @ 09:45 PM
link   
So why couldnt he be gay? Rembering that woman are here for "Reproduction" and not "Lust", then why cant the men be for pleasure and woman for reproduction? if men were so not ment to be gay, then how come a mans "G" spot is in the rectum and a womans is in the vagania? if god didnt want it to be then he wouldnt have given man a "G" spot in the first place.

being that in our society we tend to use woman for pleasure, now we are in an over-populated world burning up resorces faster than we can produce them.
on the other hand, if we would have stuck with men for pleasuer and woman for reproduction only then we would not be in an over-populated world.



new topics

top topics
 
0
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join