It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Michael Strainic - Canadian National Director MUFON Canada / Mutual UFO Network, Inc.
Dorothy Izatt can be most annoying
Now, in case you're wondering how such a gentle, kind and soft-spoken person could possibly be annoying in any possible way, just consider what Dorothy does and how she does it. If you happen to be a professional debunker, a rabid skeptic or simply a complete disbeliever in All Things Strange, then Dorothy can present a real problem to your chosen belief system. Dorothy produces evidence. Hard evidence. Over and over again. Evidence that has been so far unassailable, and that is something that the nay-sayers do not like at all. And that is probably why no-one has really attempted to discredit her work. They can't.
Originally posted by redwoodjedi
Just as a pain-in-the-*SNIP* reminder, if this thread is to be of any benefit to Dorothy and her unique case, please "flag" and "fave" this sucker all to heck. If we can get this posted on the "Hot" or better still the "Top" page, it will kick and breathe a little longer. As it is, I intend to update this thread with the latest info as it arrives. I just hope the research effort doesn't dilly-dally too long. 86 years old.......
Erik
[edit on 24-3-2008 by NGC2736]
Originally posted by Moegli
reply to post by Breadfan
Don't lose your grip You might find some truth.
From first page of this thread:
Michael Strainic - Canadian National Director MUFON Canada / Mutual UFO Network, Inc.
Dorothy Izatt can be most annoying
Now, in case you're wondering how such a gentle, kind and soft-spoken person could possibly be annoying in any possible way, just consider what Dorothy does and how she does it. If you happen to be a professional debunker, a rabid skeptic or simply a complete disbeliever in All Things Strange, then Dorothy can present a real problem to your chosen belief system. Dorothy produces evidence. Hard evidence. Over and over again. Evidence that has been so far unassailable, and that is something that the nay-sayers do not like at all. And that is probably why no-one has really attempted to discredit her work. They can't.
Originally posted by Breadfan
reply to post by Palasheea
Someone took a chalk and draw the body of Jesus on the rag. So, what's the big deal about it? You also believe the man made vine out of water?
I don't. It's bulls**t. Not because I'm a bad bad debunker raining on your parade, but because my sense of logic and common sense tells me othervise.
There you go.
[edit on 25-3-2008 by Breadfan]
Originally posted by Breadfan
Originally posted by easynow
pg146
here is the enhanced version wich clarifies the " light beings "
Why, why, why, why, why in the Great Emperor of Zeta Reticuli's name, those "definitive proof" photos always have to be crappy quality ie. blurry?
Why couldn't she just threaten those aliens with a broomstick or something, just to STAND STILL for 3 seconds so she could take a shot?
Originally posted by VisionQuest
Haha. I share and participate in your frustration. After all this time on planet Earth, countless visitations, photos, and videos; not one single really good image of an ET. (sigh). Oh well...we'll have to wait I guess.
Originally posted by A SINCLAIR
Whats most amazing about these lights is how similar they are to the Stephensville ones. I mean here you have an old camera versus todays digital tech. so if there are differences they may be attributed to the advanced technology used to film the lights over Stephensville. Why hasn't this similarity been discussed more?
AS
Originally posted by jritzmann
may not be physical enough to be photographed.
The same goes for proof. It may not exist like we expect, or desire.
Nothing philosophical about it.
Originally posted by seawolf197
reply to post by Breadfan
Breadfan
Call me backward and unenlightened, from now on I want proof?
How about this for dubious.... YOU HAVEN'T EVEN WATCHED THE VIDEO!
Could you please show a little respect by at least watching the video before you analyze, and trash it?
You have been extremely harsh in your criticism, and I for one am offended by your posts.
I have watched the video.