It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dts01
Funny that as in nowhere in any texts is Saint Paul, after the death of Christ seen anywhere close to Italy nevermind Rome
Ah well thats Religion for ya. Nothing more than heresay. Bit crazy how we feel the need to take lives based on nothing more than a story told bye some geezer 2000 years ago.
During this first extended imprisonment (61–62), most likely in Rome, Paul probably wrote his four Prison Epistles. Three of these letters were addressed to churches in Anatolia. One hundred miles inland from Ephesus stood three churches in the Lycus River valley — Laodicea, Hierapolis, and Colossae. Two letters were addressed to Colossae, a city he apparently never visited during his time in Asia (Col. 2:1; cf. also mention of the church in Hierapolis in 4:13). The Colossian church was struggling with teaching that wrongly exalted certain legalistic regulations but misunderstood the fullness of the Deity found in Christ (2:6–23). The other letter was to an individual member named Philemon and addressed a delicate personal situation. One of his slaves named Onesimus had left without permission and found Paul in Rome, a journey of over 1000 miles! Through Paul’s influence Onesimus had become a believer, so the apostle was sending him back to be reconciled to his master. Because his emissary Tychicus and Onesimus were traveling to Asia, Paul apparently decided to write another general letter to the churches in the province. This letter is now known as the Epistle to the Ephesians. Its contents, especially in the exhortations, shares many similarities with the Colossian letter. In fact, it is probably the letter to Laodicea mentioned in Colossians 4:16.
So what say you about my stance on the previous page then? I think I cut a little deeper into the heart of this conspiracy and found something we can all agree on. Not looking to toot my own horn, but I think I'm on to something. Just wnated to get some feedback before I'm buried underneath the usual finger-pointing.
Originally posted by Cuhail
reply to post by undo
I read all the arguments from both sides and I think you all defend a weak stance.
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by Bigwhammy
Atheists Assail Bill Recognizing America's Religious History
Interesting.
I wonder what the psychology behind this is....
Originally posted by IsGodET
My thoughts...
First, I question the OP's honesty as it seems to me s/he has violated terms by "authoring" a work that is not theirs without giving reference.
That said, this is a common theme in religious debate. It seems that theists try desperately to mix the aspects of science and theism in a way so that theism is legitamized by science, while at the same time bringing down scientific knowledge. This is wrongheaded and straight out dishonest. Religion and science are two different subjects of study entirely. This OP's entire statement beggs the question of god's existence.
You see, scientific minded people start from the ideal of "we exist." Then they postulate the reason why. They come up with a hypothesis and then test it. Then they test it some more. Finally they come up with an evidenced model. Religion tries to usurp this thinking with the, excuse the term, seemingly absurd knowledge that they already have the answer. "It was written down 2,000 years ago by nearly-pre-historic sheep-herders and now we will try to reduce geniuenly open-minded thinkers and testers tests to absolute quantities they cannot answer and claim we were right all along."
I'm sorry if I sound harsh, but to me this is the height of intellectual shame.
Good day.
Originally posted by idle_rocker
I beg to differ with you on the separation of science and religion. All you have to do is read the recent scientific findings to see there was definitely a higher order being who created this universe. If you don't believe me, read for yourself at www.reasons.org.
Originally posted by IsGodET
Undo: It is nice to see that you can try to refute my one sentence that seems to be up in the air. Try some more of them.
Originally posted by riley
Originally posted by idle_rocker
I beg to differ with you on the separation of science and religion. All you have to do is read the recent scientific findings to see there was definitely a higher order being who created this universe. If you don't believe me, read for yourself at www.reasons.org.
Reasons.org is a religious christian site with a clear agenda.. they even seem to be open to the 'sientific theory' of a young earth.
Could you please post these "scientific findings" from an actual objective [and scientific] source?
[edit on 24-3-2008 by riley]
Originally posted by Cuhail
reply to post by idle_rocker
And I do NOT, repeat NOT have to be a christian to go to heaven. If you think "Christianity" is the key to heaven, that's fine. I work it out differently.
"God" and I have an....understanding.
Cuhail
Originally posted by IsGodET
Idle Rocker: The reason I told whomever a minute ago that they were able to throw back the only question that seemed to be up in the air had NOTHING to do with western religion. Yes it is true that modern physics and EASTERN 'thinking' seem to coelesce. But the idea that a person can claim that atheists are somehow conspiring against religion is dumbfounded at best. Theists outnumber atheists 1,000:1, at least. It seems to me that such numbers would make the believer confident in themselves and not have to result to such sophomoric standards to lash out at someone who simply doesn't believe as he does.