Best UFO mothership footage EVER!

reply to post by realanswers


NEW FOOTAGE of Stephenville Texas UFO

I have seen that before. I guess it was big.

The witness reports did a graphic that made it look like and array
of motors.

However one large centrally located motor as in ol' time saucers and
the modern triangle might be at work so lone as the powerful static
charge and positive ions surrounds the craft.

Sparks occurring anywhere due to static charges which I thought
would never be related to UFO but now do.

However I think some always thought that but had no idea why it would
work.
I have two bits of info... one one a mechanism for generation a great
amout of static charge and two a beginning to understanding why it works.

The mechanism is Tesla related so its easy to understand than some
mercury gizmo , a pancake coil transformer secondary with a single termination
generates the static charges from an AC genertor.
A central one wire Tesla bulb is given DC pulses that send the electrons
away in a beam central to the craft thus keeping hold of the surrounding
positive ions.

Static charges are a shield to lines of force and any electrical momentum.
movement of the beam by slight voltage inside the ship causes movement.

ED: This is the static machine as opposed to a field machine and
supported by the gaseous ether the electrical engineering principle
of electrical force controlling a constant momentum.





[edit on 3/17/2008 by TeslaandLyne]

Originally posted by GrayFox

Originally posted by thestateofnirvana
Yawn to all of it. Blimp over Stephensville (there is a very similar clip that I can't find anymore. Original footage zooms in and you can see it is the Sanyo blimp. Looked just like the "additional" Stephensville UFO footage.)

I thought of that too. But isn't it too wide? I don't think the Sanyo blimp has that many lights either. Can anyone provide that footage?.)

I wish I would have favorited the video to show everyone here. It was nearly identical, slow hover, flashing lights. Point is a lot of things can look UFO (which they are until you can identify them)

I know I want to believe all of it but you get down to the bread and butter and there really isn't much compelling evidence. Though I myself believe I have witnessed a triangle UFO leave the atmosphere but who's to say it wasn't a few satellites? I don't think they would be so close together though and be in a formation. Anyways next piece of evidence please...

Satellites? That sounds like something the government would say. Think about how the craft looked and moved. Satellites don't come down into the atmosphere for a look around and leave again. They move in a fixed path.


[edit on 17-3-2008 by GrayFox]

The path was pretty fixed. By leaving the atmosphere I meant that they disappeared from view before crossing the horizon. It reminded me of when I saw the International Space Station with a shuttle by it. However there were three in a triangle formation (I don't know if they were truly satellites or UFO). I seem to remember the triangle pattern rotating slowly but can't quite recall as it was a few years back.

Originally posted by coastlinekid
None of those videos are conclusive...

Some could be flares, maybe blimps ...
Flashing strobes are usually a sign of FAA compliant anti-collision lights...

I wish some thread starters would stop being so sensationalist in their titles...

"Best UFO Mothership footage EVER!" ...right...

These type of thread titles do the entire subject a disservice...

Well said.

What in any of that footage can be PROVEN to be a UFO at all, much less a "mothership"?

Sensationalism indeed, this thread should be considered a hoax with that title.

Originally posted by NewWorldOver
What's with all this 'blimp' nonsense? Do you really think there is someone with millions of dollars crafting fake UFO bodies and dressing up their recreational blimps?

Do we really think a story that gathered national attention was going to drift for a full month without anyone taking responsiblity for the masterful hoax?

Not a blimp. Not a hoax.

Some good vids posted by the OP. Except for the Phoenix lights. That incident needs to be dropped permanently.

Why the talk of dressing up their recreational blimps? Blimps are blimps and they serve a purpose of advertising. People are drawn to flashing things in the sky (obviously) and often film these things. If you can't zoom in it might look like a hovering UFO, or you may already be aware of what it is and film it as a UFO to sell to the public. I'm not sure why this concept is so bizarre and unbelievable

Regardless of that as far as the whole thing being a hoax in Stephensville I never claimed that. I just think the "additional Stephensville footage" is hoaxed. Since it was all mainstream news I think this additional footage would have been given to the media too. However all I have seen is what looks like the Sanyo blimp as well as some dancing Neon lights that look totally staged (i.e. no reference points, not leaving, etc.) Why assume these are legit? I believe people really saw something over Stephenville but these are just hoaxes capitalizing on the hype to garner Youtube views in my opinion...

Ironically I found the Phoenix lights to be the most compelling yet out of all of those vids

Originally posted by NewWorldOver

Originally posted by GrayFox
Satellites? That sounds like something the government would say. Think about how the craft looked and moved. Satellites don't come down into the atmosphere for a look around and leave again.

I myself saw a satellite-like object shoot out of the atmosphere with a pop. I did not try to cling to my previous belief that it was a satellite... I formally recognized it as a UFO.

If you saw a UFO, say you saw a UFO. Don't try to convince yourself otherwise just to fit the status quo.

Likewise, when we see a UFO on video, let us call it a UFO. If an explanation arises that fits, let's use it. But why make up explanations like 'it's a blimp' or 'that's a strange formation of satellites leaving the atmosphere.'

Seems to me like there is alot of genuine UFO footage that people aren't comfortable calling a UFO. They would rather fabricate explanations to avoid the idea of a UFO...

[edit on 17-3-2008 by NewWorldOver]

I am not at all trying to fit the "stauts quo" but just because something looks bizarre doesn't mean it's archane or other-worldly. I take a scientific approach to it is all. I still believe it was a UFO in fact, just trying to apply Ockham's razor. I am on a mission to find that blimp footage now, as no one can truly see the similarity here with the exception of one poster...

And by the way I am totally cool with the idea of aliens and UFO's.

Well didn't take long at all

www.youtube.com...

and the reveal:

www.youtube.com...


Look familiar?

[edit on 17-3-2008 by thestateofnirvana]

reply to post by Acidtastic


Very kwel, never seen this before. When you think you seen them all, eh... If this was real, it's enormous (miles long). Gave me the creeps, I like to see more clips from this, hopefully a night vision to see the rest of it

Originally posted by realanswers
I don't think whole city populations would be wrong about something over a mile in length moving over there heads.

Also, let's hear what the fighter jets and air traffic control had to say DURING their UFO chase:

br.youtube.com...

br.youtube.com...



And, here's a jet that was hit by a UFO:

br.youtube.com...

The Second link is hard to believe as real, sounds like a text-to-speech digital voice

Originally posted by ironfist
Hi,

I've watched the 2008 clips a few times and all i see is a Blimp. You can see flashing lights on the top and bottom, which is what i would expect to see. I don't think this is a mother ship or a UFO.

Good find anyway

I wish the footage was clearer too. I thought blimp as well because it looks like FAA anti-collision lights to me. Why doesn't that camera zoom in? This is patrol car footage? Does it not have that capability?

The initial videos show patterns of glo-lanterns, an obvious fake and a blimp in that order.

Check this out www.youtube.com...

They have been the cause of most of our recent UFO sightings. Three will always form a triangle. Half a dozen or so, tied together with fishing line will usually form a curve.


[edit on 17/3/08 by Myrdyn]

Originally posted by NewWorldOver
There are better cases out there. Like Mexicos UFO fleets. Witnessed by thosuands of people on a regular basis. Such events in America would put people into hysterics.

I hate to say this, but it seems like they're probably just sky lanterns.
Those things are tricky, it seems. Another Earthly object that fits into the mix of misidentifications.

Honestly? I don't think Ive ever seen nor will I ever believe a video from ATS as far as being a genuine UFO. I lurked along time before I joined, and don't think Ive seen anything to make me think anyone has any real photos/videos of UFOs.
But its good entertainment.

BTW those were nice videos, most of them. Thanks.

Originally posted by coastlinekid
None of those videos are conclusive...

Some could be flares, maybe blimps ...
Flashing strobes are usually a sign of FAA compliant anti-collision lights...

I wish some thread starters would stop being so sensationalist in their titles...

"Best UFO Mothership footage EVER!" ...right...

These type of thread titles do the entire subject a disservice...

I wish this were Digg, so I could digg you up for that comment.

Originally posted by realanswers

www.siriusufo.org...

[edit on 16-3-2008 by realanswers]

What language is this site in?

Originally posted by RandomThought
Originally posted by realanswers
I don't think whole city populations would be wrong about something over a mile in length moving over there heads.

Also, let's hear what the fighter jets and air traffic control had to say DURING their UFO chase:

br.youtube.com...

br.youtube.com...

The Second link is hard to believe as real, sounds like a text-to-speech digital voice

By the way, it says in the description of these that they are not real. They are just what you said, text to speech recordings that someone made and posted.

reply to post by thestateofnirvana


Firstly, I'm not saying that this is what you saw.
Secondly, I'm no expert - maybe someone else can provide further info.

I have read however that a number of sightings of 3 points of light moving across the sky in unison can be put down to a set of 3 American military tracking satellites in orbit. Apparently as they move in unison they can give the impression of being joined on a large triangular craft.

Maybe they appeared and then dissapeared due to their height and moving into the shadow of the earth and no longer lit by the sun. I have no idea of their specific orbit, altitude, how far apart they are or anything, just that I have read that they have been positively identified as of American origin and used for tracking purposes.

As an aside, and hopefully somebody can explain this, it has always amazed me how bright satellites appear, almost as if they are a massively self illuminated object. What do we make them out of, some super reflective material ?

Is that to stop them absorbing heat ?

If you painted them black would they then be invisible to the naked eye but heat up too much ?

Originally posted by chunder
reply to post by thestateofnirvana

 

Firstly, I'm not saying that this is what you saw.
Secondly, I'm no expert - maybe someone else can provide further info.

I have read however that a number of sightings of 3 points of light moving across the sky in unison can be put down to a set of 3 American military tracking satellites in orbit. Apparently as they move in unison they can give the impression of being joined on a large triangular craft.

Maybe they appeared and then dissapeared due to their height and moving into the shadow of the earth and no longer lit by the sun. I have no idea of their specific orbit, altitude, how far apart they are or anything, just that I have read that they have been positively identified as of American origin and used for tracking purposes.

As an aside, and hopefully somebody can explain this, it has always amazed me how bright satellites appear, almost as if they are a massively self illuminated object. What do we make them out of, some super reflective material ?

Is that to stop them absorbing heat ?

If you painted them black would they then be invisible to the naked eye but heat up too much ?

Well then that sounds like a plausible explanation (however I haven't ruled out other explanations). I wonder if anyone can source that? I would be interested in reading about it...

It is pretty amazing how bright some satelites can be, while others seem dim. I noticed the International Space Station was extremely well lit and I saw it around dusk which might have something to do with it. It was pretty amazing to look up and see it docked with the shuttle. They both appeared well lit and initially I thought UFO until a friend informed me it was announced on the news that it would be flying over our city at dusk. But to think of people in that orbiting around the Earth that quickly...

You got to love how that stephensville footage ...
they had camera's set all over town ect.....
lol
And none was squggly line's tryignt o tell us our futre lol

my lord i give up on stephensville lol

they can't make there mind's up

squggly line's or a ship?
comon people

The Phoenix Lights video you posted shows the flares dropping. That is not the footage of the UFO that flew over.

Originally posted by The Lizard King

Originally posted by realanswers

www.siriusufo.org...

[edit on 16-3-2008 by realanswers]

What language is this site in?

I think it's Brazilian or something. I had trouble with posting the weblink that has it in English. You will just have to click "English" on the right side of that page in order to read it in English.