It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shadow_Lord
What is really interesting about these discoveries is the path. They follow the same general path. Which mean there is a source somewhere. Whether something broke into smaller pieces and turned into what we see now, which means there could be more. Or if something nudged them.
Potentially Hazardous Asteroids (PHAs) are currently defined based on parameters that measure the asteroid's potential to make threatening close approaches to the Earth. Specifically, all asteroids with an Earth Minimum Orbit Intersection Distance (MOID) of 0.05 AU or less and an absolute magnitude (H) of 22.0 or less are considered PHAs.
In other words, asteroids that can't get any closer to the Earth (i.e. MOID) than 0.05 AU (roughly 7,480,000 km or 4,650,000 mi) or are smaller than about 150 m (500 ft) in diameter (i.e. H = 22.0 with assumed albedo of 13%) are not considered PHAs.
There are currently 944 known PHAs.
Only those close approaches within 0.1 AU occurring within 30 days from 2008-Mar-14 UT are included
I just want to know if there is a limit to what this "area" can take before we on the surface notice something.
We have to remember that it's a threat we have been living with for millennia
Originally posted by Siren
The difference is the increase in the number of threats over the last ten years. Some time ago I came across a chart, which I am looking for, that showed the increases over the years. If I find it, I will post the link.
Originally posted by Siren
Refer to the following chart:
Only those close approaches within 0.1 AU occurring within 30 days from 2008-Mar-14 UT are included
Originally posted by Siren
I don’t know which is worse the coronal hole or the number of asteroids floating by us.