posted on Mar, 7 2008 @ 06:44 PM
The point of this thread on hell is not to force what I believe about the existence of hell onto any of you... So what is the point of this thread
than? To prove to you that there is a possibility that the whole existence of hell could be a interpretational error, and that there is a possibility
that eternal damnation is being separated from God for all eternity, and that the lake of fire will be the final resting place for the wicked. Not
for a place of eternal torture, but it may be their second death; a final death, one with out a chance of resurrection.
Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
If heaven is a place for the good, and hell is the place for the wicked, and God new that man would sin and become wicked, why did he not at this time
create heaven, earth, and hell? (A place for the good, a place for the battle, and a place for the wicked.)
Genesis 2:16 And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, “Of every tree of the garden you may freely eat; but of the tree of knowledge of good
and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.”
My only question is that, rather than informing Adam that he would die (ouch), why did God not inform Adam that if he ate of the tree of knowledge he
would first die (ouch) then be brought back to life, and then cast into a lake of fire which would continue to cause him incredible pain and agony for
all of eternity (double ouch). You might argue that Adam could not understand pain because he had never felt it, but the same applies to death
because not only had he never before died, he had never before seen anything die.
So what did Jesus mean in Mark 3:29 (but he who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is subject to eternal damnation.)
when he warned us of eternal damnation? The very word damnation comes from the Greek word krisis (kree’-sis), which can be interpreted as a
separation.
So if it can mean separation than Mark 3:29 could have been interpreted but he who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is
subject to eternal separation.
Now remember I am not trying to disprove hell, I am merely trying to prove that it could exist because of interpretation errors from language to
language. The interpreter’s preconceived beliefs can and did impact the words they chose to use during the conversion processes.
So what is the lake of fire referred to in Revelations 20:14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
Ok first of all, people sometimes assume that the lake of fire is hell, so how can hell be cast into hell? So lets first brake down the lake of fire.
This is not the same lake of fire that Jesus speaks of (gehenna). This is actually referring to the word lake (large body of water) and the word
fire (pur) is actually referring to a burning fire. The word translated to hell is the Greek word hades, which can be and sometimes is translated as
the word grave (place of rest). Ok, so far this is very confusing I will admit. The point is however that this verse from the bible can mean this.
And death (the wicked; people who are already considered dead because of their sins) and hell (their graves, from their first death) were cast into
the lake of fire. This is the second death (a final death with out chance of resurrection) Why toss their graves into the lake of fire with them? If
we toss their grave (where they had been resting) in with them we symbolically and literally cleanse the earth of their very existence. What does
this lake of fire do to the wicked?
The lake of fire turns them to stubble, ash under our feet according to Malachi 4:1-3 For behold, the day is coming, Burning like an oven, And all
the proud, yes, all who do wickedly will be stubble. And the day which is coming shall burn them up,”Says the Lord of hosts, That will leave them
neither root (possibly their grave?) nor branch (Possibly their body?). But to you who fear My name The sun of Righteousness shall
arise with healing in his wings; and you shall go out and grow fat like stall-fed calves. You shall trample the wicked, for they shall be ashes under
the soles of your feet on the day I do this,” says the Lord of hosts.
So here lies another question brought to my attention, what about the wailing and gnashing of teeth referred to in Matthew 13:42 And shall cast
them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Well I certainly don’t question that there will be people screaming in agony as they are cast into their final resting place and burned to ash, but
am I to believe that this wailing and gnashing of teeth will go on for all eternity. No, and there are two very good reasons why; the first I already
went over when I showed you the biblical text that states they will become stubble and ashes (stubble and ashes don’t scream) under our feet, but
the second reason is in the Final book and the second to last chapter of the bible where it states that there will be no more pain or crying for the
former things have passed away, Revelations 21:4 And God will wipe away every tear from their eyes; there shall be no more death, nor sorrow, nor
crying. There shall be no more pain, for the former things have passed away.
Now this not only states that the wicked have passed away and are no more, but it also implies that there will be no more sorrow, and I have to assume
based on the character of God that if people were screaming in pain (a contradiction to Rev 21:4), and because He is omnipresent He would see this
going on, He would feel sorrow (another contradiction to Rev 21:4) for these people no matter how wicked they are. Jesus tells us that we
should love our enemies in Luke 6:27 But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you
and what He taught us, comes to Him from His Father, GOD! God would want us to love our enemies, because He loves His enemies.