How The Clinton Iraq Plan Became The Bush Plan

Our media and the Democratic Party have erased the actions undertaken by President Clinton against Iraq over supposed Weapons of Mass Destruction. Even the 911 conspiracy crowd postulates that the WTC attack was allowed to happen to "justify an attack on Iraq", completely erasing the blueprint in place by President Clinton. Erased from history are the 1,000,000 dead from bombings and the use of sanctions against Iraq under Clinton. Erased from history are the thousands of articles from around the world stating that the Clinton administration forced the UN into sanctions in Iraq. Erased from history is this video from 60 Minutes:
www.youtube.com...

Today the media allows Hillary to claim credit for actions taken under Bill's term. Yet none ask her, if Iraq had no WMD, what did those 1 million die for? If Bush's actions have created more terrorists, did Clinton's as well? Rather than admit neither party has a clue about the Middle East, the press simply refuses to ask the really tough questions. Democrats hope everyone forgets, conspiracy freeks refuse to ask any questions prior to the Bush Presidency.

Here is a reminder:

Iraq crisis: At a glance
news.bbc.co.uk...

reply to post by Psychomike


Well you can never take the fact that It was under the Bush administration that we invaded Iraq..

The invasion of Iraq has always been under the table since Bush Sr. failed to walk into Baghdad, but his Son Bush Jr. finish daddy's job.

I can blame Clinton for free trade that is killing America but the Invasion of Iraq? that was Bush and only Bush, plus corporate America and the oil barons behind following all profiteers of war.

1,000,000 dead and Albright saying in public we couldn't let Saddam stay in power- yet you say the Clinton's are innocent?

So, you believe there were WMD in Iraq? Or did those people die for nothing?

Just out of curiosity, when Goldwater ran against LBJ, he called Johnson a liar for saying we weren't sending more troops into Nam. Goldwater said the plan was already in the works, but if he got in we'd fight for a year and if we didn't win we'd be out in one year.

How do you interpret this?

Originally posted by marg6043
I can blame Clinton for free trade that is killing America but the Invasion of Iraq? that was Bush and only Bush, plus corporate America and the oil barons behind following all profiteers of war.

Bush and only Bush?

Sure, let's ignore that we've been attacking Iraq since way before Bush even ran for president.

Let's ignore that a huge portion of our executive was strongly for the war.

Let's ignore the fact that our Senate, Democrats and Republicans alike, voted with very little dissent to authorize the use of force in Iraq by George W. Bush.

Let's ignore that our stance toward Iraq is a long-standing policy that carried through the Clinton administration.


Let's pin the blame on one man for the mistakes of nearly our entire government, especially the Senate.