posted on Mar, 1 2008 @ 09:55 AM
As a Moor he had black blood. But let's take a look at what he did in 1 year, that historians today attribute to Washington:
Hanson's term as President of the United States in Congress Assembled, during this critical formation period, did have longstanding influence.
Among the accomplishments of Hanson's presidency of Congress:
Delivered the official Thanks of Congress to George Washington for his victory at Yorktown
Commended Gen. Lafayette and thanked France for his services
Pressed states to keep up their commitments to sending delegates to Congress, which was often short of a quorum
Passed legislation for the Bank of North America, the first central bank
Appointed a Secretary of the United States to assist in correspondence and record-keeping
Granted Gen. Washington broad powers to negotiate prisoner exchanges with Britain; Washington immediately worked out a trade of Gen. Cornwallis for
Henry Laurens, the first president of the Continental Congress
Established the United States Mint
Established the predecessor agency of the State Department
Proclaimed the first national Thanksgiving holiday
Created the position of Chairman of Congress, a predecessor of the vice-presidency
Negotiated a peace treaty with Britain
Settled a dispute between Connecticut and Pennsylvania, with Hanson acting as an equivalent of Chief Justice
Called for the first national census
Now, even if you dismiss claims that he was the first President (there were two before him, but they each served less than a year) let me ask a couple
of questions. Is it wise for us to forget our pre- revolutionary period on up to Washington? Is it fair to attribute to Washington policies that
Hanson put in place?