DIgital Television Mind Control

mind control

do u mean like subliminal messages

becase that has already happned which is a fact

like Disney subliminal messages

reply to post by greeneyedleo


Yes, but im sure you still have to pay a monthly fee.

Maybe we are looking in the wrong direction. What if the goverment found that anolog is causing cancer. They would never admit that because the civil cases would destroy some very large and powerful companies. I don't know but if the govement is spending large amounts of tax payers money by giving each house hold two $40. coupons, then something just may be up.

I think they want the old frequencies for non other than the RFID chip technology. Pretty sure they are trying to find a frequency so that the corporations can introduce this new technology into the U.S. for corporate America and the global markets. Also that old frequency was used initially for its capablility to easily travel through buildings and walls.

Besides Donald Rumsfeld being the ex-chair of the FCC's High Definition Television Advisory Committee (1992 - 1993) at it's inception thusly directing it's future in social engineering terms,

the only other thing you need to be worried about as far as how this technology develops..

is the fact that the VHF/UHF frequency band that's been used for decades for TV broadcasting, is now what is to be open to be used for bio-telemetry and it's future forms and parallel technologies.. ie: veri-chips.

it's not the D-TV you need to be wary of.. it's what's taking analog TV's place in that VERY valuable broadcast range.

-

[edit on 23-5-2008 by prevenge]

Honestly...

The main reason behind the digital switchover is the massive savings in bandwidth that will be achieved. Not only does this free up many frequencies for other uses, such as 3G mobile phone and wireless services, but it allows broadcasters to provide much more content within the same amount of bandwidth.

The governments like to encourage the switchover because they get to raise huge sums of cash from licensing off the newly available bandwidth. Gordon Brown, when he was Chancellor, made billions off the sale of 3G licenses in the UK, which he then used to provide himself a "war chest" of spending money when things looked bad for the Government.

Not mind control... If you really think that your TV can control your brain, I'd suggest this is only possible because you lack the mental faculties to think for yourself.

But hey, don't listen to me. What do I know? I've only worked in telecoms for 8 years.... (for those across the pond who aren't familiar, thats called sarcasm)

I always thought is was weird on how the government got involved and passed a law to force the networks to go digital. You think this would be a market place decision and technology would do the adjustments. But ask yourself this question is why would the government want to rush this and force the hands? What purpose could it serve the government to speed this up? With the actions of the current administration you must ask these questions and wonder what those little government think tanks have come up with. Maybe I'm just aproniod but these are questions we should ask. WHY? Why then, what purpose, who gains? who looses? what could be lost? any ideas or theorys...

reply to post by kr0n1ck405


If you read my post you will see why the Governments are keen on this.

Here is a nice little story from OFCOM, the UK telecoms regulator:

Ofcom announced today the beginning of the Digital Dividend Review (DDR) - the project which will examine the options arising from the release of spectrum afforded by the digital switchover programme.

The airwaves – or radio spectrum – are a finite national asset. The five terrestrial television channels that currently broadcast in analogue (BBC1, BBC2, ITV, Channel 4 and five) use nearly half of the most valuable bands of spectrum below 1GHz.

Television uses spectrum based on a 50 year old planning model when there were very few alternative uses of these frequencies. There have been a number of significant innovations since, such as colour television and mobile telephony; however, this important spectrum is still used according to a plan originally prepared in the late 1950s.

Source - OFCOM

I highlighted an important part of the article. basically, the analogue signals are hogging the bandwidth, which can be put to much more efficient use with digital signals.

that does make a lot of sense, but i still dont trust them, expect the worse, hope for the best, maybe we come out ok...

I don't think the problem is with the box, I think it has more to do with the signal, a digital signal is different, from the analog one. My set certainly does weird things now that it never did with the old one. You can mess with the box but not the signal. That can mess with you, the old one put you to sleep, the new seems more capable.

reply to post by Pellevoisin

does anyone believe that this device could really work in reverse

Originally posted by scottr.
Has anyone else thought about the new DTV thing coming next year? Its kind of weird to think that hey would do something like this. But for what? The only other thing I can think about is making more money. I mean if you want to watch tv then you will have to by the "box". Saying that then you have a mind control device that could control what you think with out you even knowing it.
I dont know I just dont trust it. But if the whole mind control thing isnt it, then its the money thing.

You know the beauty of electronics? You can build them yourself. If you fear a D/A box you get at wallmart will control your mind, then don't buy it and instead build one yourself, in fact make a business out of it: "Mind Control Free D/A Converter Box".

And no, is not about money. If I was a TV station owner I'd be happy to transmit in analog, it's much cheaper and simpler. However, people who get a taste of digital signal don't want to go back to analog anymore, and the FCC doesn't want stations wasting bandwidth anymore, so not much of a choice there.

Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
I don't think the problem is with the box, I think it has more to do with the signal, a digital signal is different, from the analog one.

Care to explain how it's different? To make a digital signal all you need to do is sample the old analog signal and decide if a one or a zero is to be transmitted. There is really no more science to it. If you want to transmit secret messages or what not, why not do it using analog signal?

Here, an analog signal(sine wave) and how it looks in the digital world(square wave):


How exactly is the square wave more dangerous than the sine wave?

[edit on 7-8-2008 by daniel_g]

reply to post by HellcatEmi

I don't know why it always has to be some secret scheme. Everything always has to be some secret alien, or gov't cover-up for something sinister. Quit being so f#cking stupid all the time. It's the year 2008, its about damned time we started showing progress with our technologies to the people.

It's digital cable, big friggen deal. No one thought that CD's were mind control devices. No one assumed that XM Satillite Radio was a mind control device.

Television in general as it is today has the ability to brainwash people into believing anything that is on the news channels. Not saying the news channels are false in thier information or otherwise.

Are people just fishing around, looking for any little tiny thing they can turn into a conspiracy?

to get the answers, you need right questions.

Q. Why would they put nano cameras/mics in the digital boxes?
A. Considering the current spy program the current admin has in place, why wouldn't they? Human behavior speaks loudly! All it takes is one slip of the tongue and could spawn a huge investigation. (purely Hypothetically). Think about it. Why do they spy now, the agenda is still the same and will be regardless of what admin is in place. 'They' have been able to track your IP for decades!!

Personally, it's about information. Information is power. Do I think there is a device in my box now? Doubt it, however, I won't put it past 'them'..

you are correct.

fibre optics,which is the prime method of digital signal delivery was reverse engineered from salvaged,or as i like to put it , "set up" ufo locations.

the intention was for us to install fibre optics throughout our societies for the purpose of sending in qauntum entanlged photons trough them with which "they" can precisly manipulate sources of electromagnetism which are usually delivered through the electric grid,invented by tesla,the man who also invented the flying machines we have which resemble ufos.not to mention thousands of other systems used by "they".

what is also interesting is that those who are afflcited with morgellons are also permeated with fibre optic fibres within their body and on the surface,disguised as human hairs.once again to allow qauntum entlangled photons to enter the body at target specific points such as nerve endings in order to control the movements of the body.

photons are the carriers of electomagnetic force,everything form electricity,magnetisn to visible light.thus if you can control photons with remote quantum entanglement ,you can control all electromagnetism including that which recides in the human body such as voltages within the brain,ie mind control.

thus fibre optics digital network serves as a delivery system for remote manipulation of electromagnetism.

haha...

Its just another step forward in technology.

Nothing suss here, mind control is the worst concept ever.

You really think someone could have the power to re-program your own brain.

the tv shows you like to watch, are probably more capable of programming your own brain.

I worked for a company that developed HDTV. I can tell you that companies like mine lobbied the government heavily to have the signals switched over. It was all about selling TV's and new technologies and their programming. Never mind the mind control, kids, just follow the money.

The digital switch is because digital tv (or anything for that matter) is more reliable than analog and is easier to transmit. Mind control would be hard to pull off since it would be fairly easy to decode the signal and see exactly what's being transmitted.