posted on Feb, 26 2008 @ 01:55 PM
I think a good idea for us to do is to form a comprehensive list of the most blatant discrepancies in the 9/11 story. I suggest this because there are
too many people attacking obscure discrepancies in the "truther" side of the story. Because we are attempting to construct an alternate set of
events based upon the available evidence, we are bound to have errors. By exposing these minor errors, it makes all "truthers" look like loonies in
the eyes of the easily manipulated masses. However, by presenting a comprehensive list of the most indisputable evidence of conspiracy, it is harder
to disregard, as even one major discrepancy would destroy the official story. Here are what I consider to be pretty indisputable facts that suggest
conspiracy:
1) The speed and style the buildings fell. Free-fall speed and straight down. Also the visible explosions.
2) The hotspots of molten metal whose temperature was hundreds of degrees above the temperature which jet fuel burns.
3) Building 7 and its obvious demolition.
4) Bin Ladin tape.
5) Physics.
6) NORAD's lack of response
7) 9/11 Commission Report and the circumstances under which it was compiled.
Feel free to add more to the list, explain more about what is already listed, or attempt to dispute these things. However, even if one of these cannot
be adequately explained according to the official story, then the official story is flawed, suggesting conspiracy.