Man claims he had cocain driven homosexual sex with Obama.

Man claims he had cocain driven homosexual sex with Obama.

www.worldnetdaily.com

WASHINGTON – The electrifying presidential campaign of Barack Obama faces a new challenge – a Minnesota man who claims he took coc aine in 1999 with the then-Illinois legislator and participated in homosexual acts with him.

When his story was ignored by the news media, Larry Sinclair made his case last month in a YouTube video, which has now been viewed more than a quarter-million times.

(visit the link for the full news article)

Gotta love election years...

www.worldnetdaily.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

Hummm...isn't there already a thread on this topic?

Try here: www.abovepolitics.com...

[edit on 18-2-2008 by realmatrix]

And why is that not suprising??????? lol

This is Swift Boat 2008.

The Clintons as well as the Neo-Cons will stop at nothing. It's quite sad really.

[edit on 18/2/08 by kosmicjack]

reply to post by realmatrix


its not in ATSN and its allowed to have the same topic in diffrent forums.
then again that topic has members posting more then 1 line each

on topic?
anyone really find this supprising at all. he has been tipped off as a front runner and with a good chance for the hotseat.
of course there will be people out there that will do anything to discredit him or make a name for them selves at someone elses expense.

as dispicible as it is that person is prob going to make a neat sum out of his acusations

reply to post by bodrul


I'm no Obama (or Clinton - or anyone in the DNC) supporter but, honestly now....who gives a rats behind? If he was an active Cocaine user, I would care about that (I don't want our President actively using drugs or in the recent past).

I'm not condoning the behavior, but hasn't everyone done things they aren't proud of, or wouldn't want the public at large knowing about? Hasn't everyone (again, not condoning) 'tied one on' and acted the fool at some point in their life?

If he likes men too, why should we care? What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?

My anger is directed at the story, not towards anyone here.

I figure this would be a great boon to his ultra-left supporters. Not only is he black (half anyway) but now he's apparently homosexual and a proponent of drug legalization.

If he would just get off the whole "tax everyone to death to pay for alcoholics liver transplants and take all the guns away" kick I might vote for him to put a stop to the gay marriage noise and drug war idiocy.

reply to post by Shataken

yeah ...and the clintons killed people and were drug runners, and kerry never deserved his medals, and the democrats are the ones destroying this country, and the press are a bunch of liberals... geez...what else you got...get a grip and stop being a karl rove lackey

reply to post by Shataken


It is certainly of the utmost importance to know all the intimate details of all sexual encounters that our political candidates have ever engaged in. That is the way it should be. How else can we know what kind of leader that person is? We need to know everything, from the smallest detail to the most bizarre sexual encounters.

Kudos to World Net Daily! They have certainly distinguished themselves again. They easily step past their respectable journalistic rivals, like the National Enquire and that icon of journalism, Perez Hilton!! Yes, World Net Daily has much to be proud of!

However, I would not want to distract from the larger, more important issues, such as whether Barack Hussein Obama is actually a sneak cigarette smoker. See HERE for my thread on that very important topic!

Although it is good to know all the details of Obama’s sexual nature, it is not nearly as pertinent as whether he still smokes (the danger of second-hand smoke being what it is.) Let’s address the character issues in correct precedence. Smoking first!

Edit: Fix spelling errors.


[edit on 18-2-2008 by Buck Division]

True or not, I predict this news will solidify Obama's voter base and insure his victory over Hillary.

It was this very same kind of allegation against Clinton in 1992 that resonated with the public, put Clinton in the position of a victim, and turned him into the "Comeback Kid."

Of course, those allegations turned out to be true, but at the time it was the best thing that could have happened to Clinton.

Obamarama The Rense Sinclair Interview Pt. 1
youtube.com...


Obamarama The Rense Sinclair Interview Pt. 2
youtube.com...

Perhaps this isn't even targeted at Obama's liberal base. Just as the Ron Paul smear tactics over racist newsletters were not intended to sway his core supporters.

Painting Obama as a party-animal drives away conservative support. All the ultra-right wingers disappointed with McCain but unwilling to sit out the vote. Instead of adhering to principles like small government, low taxes, individual liberty and voting for the LP nominee, they throw their vote away and check the box next to who they see as the "lesser of two evils."

Liberal Democrat support will only be strengthened by these allegations. It's the Christian Right that is turned off by the notion of a black coke-head on the down-low in the White House.

Homosexual activity = I don't care. I dont' think anyone cares. Except perhaps that it would mean that he cheated on his wife which would make him a liar. (and what politician isn't a liar these days?) Other than that, most (but not all) Americans wouldn't care about the gay sex thing.

Cocaine use = I care. That is breaking the law and you can't have a POTUS that is under the influence of ANY drug - including alcohol. It may have been okay to have a drunk POTUS like Buchanen or Grant a hundred years ago .. but not now when all the drunk has to do is push a button and the world blows up.

Originally posted by apc
Painting Obama as a party-animal drives away conservative support.

Obama has NO conservative support. None.
There isn't any to try to take away.

- He's a firm believer in the culture-of-death.
Conservatives are the opposite - embracing life.

- He's a firm believer in stealing money from the productive tax payers and handing it to the unproductive (he calls it raising taxes). Conseravtives (and most moderates) are the opposite - believing in rewarding productivity.

- He's a firm believer in cutting the space program 'just for five years'. (yeah - like he'd ever start it up again! ha!) to fund his give away programs. Conservatives (and most moderates) are just the opposite and are capable of seeing the benefits of the space program for all of humanity.

- He's a firm believer in cutting our national defense. Conservatives (and most moderates) are just the opposite - understanding the need for national defense.

- He's a firm believer in handing illegal aliens drivers licenses and giving them money and handouts taken straight from the productive middle class America. Conservatives (and most moderates) are the exact opposite. (which is also why McCain is a moderate, and not a conseravtive)

Obama has NO conservative support to take away. It's unfortunate that he has any support from anyone at all.

ATTN - oralfixation - your two YouTube links have been taken down. Kinda makes ya' wonder why, eh? (I smell coverup - conspiracy)

Originally posted by apc
It's the Christian Right that is turned off by the notion of a black coke-head on the down-low in the White House.

Really?

I'm not disagreeing, but I really see the Christian Right as a very small part of the voting public and I certainly don't see Christians as a monolithic political faction.

I do definitely think that Christians will be turned off by the description you provide, but I would hope that many others would be looking for a more stable personality in the highest office in the land.

Clinton's salvation was that he appealed to the common indiscretions of youth that were nearly universal among boomers.

Yeah, he experimented with pot and if he wasn't a smoker, one might believe that he didn't inhale, although that's the whole point of smoking pot.

Yes, he was accused of taking sexual advantage of a few women, but the smear campaign against the women and their own behavior made the allegations questionable, at best.

I'm sure that there is an element of the voter population who would be inspired by "a black coke-head on the down-low in the White House", but I'm not sure they'd be in a condition to make it to the polls on election day.

I would hope that a vast majority of Americans would find such a prospect horrifying.

That Obama might have done such a thing might appeal to his voter base if and only if, he has repented and changed his sinful ways, which does sound like something only the Christian right would feel, but we're not talking about the mayor of Zolle, LA, here.

Americans on the whole are a forgiving sort, except for the fringes, but the idea of a philandering, coke-head in the White House during these critical times should be frightening to all.


[edit on 2008/2/19 by GradyPhilpott]

Originally posted by FlyersFan

Obama has NO conservative support. None.

Well, not anymore.

When he came here to Kansas City a week or so ago he had a significant Republican showing that was succeeded by a couple days of banter on local talk radio. He has conservative support. It seems anyone who is disgusted with McCain, and isn't crazy enough to turn to Hillary, is looking at Obama.

Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
I'm not disagreeing, but I really see the Christian Right as a very small part of the voting public and I certainly don't see Christians as a monolithic political faction.

I perhaps see them as having a greater influence than you do. But regardless, this sort of publicity is just the thing to drive them away. Which, I speculate, is the point. People don't vote with logic and reason. If they did the status of Obama would likely be irrelevant.

Since the youtube video was taken down, here's an MP3 of the interview:

www.zshare.net...

The videos are back.

Obamarama The Rense Sinclair Interview Pt. 1
www.youtube.com...


Obamarama The Rense Sinclair Interview Pt. 2
www.youtube.com...

Uh, wasn't Bush a Coke head, Druggie addled DUI driver who smoked more pot then Cheech and Chong? I doubt this will hurt Obama, though I'd like it to. He's too young to be assassinated but that is what will happen if he is elected. Do you really think the millions of racists and bigots, er, republicans(Note I say republicans not conservatives as there is nothing conservative about being a racist or bigot no matter how much Fox Noise tries to smear RP) will let a black man be president?

reply to post by Shataken


Yeah...He's probably getting paid to say whatever. This is silly. Americans are so bloody tired of this kind of crap..When all we want is to get to the issues and fix our broken country.