NWO Agenda timeline

Presidential election will not take place (the main candidates are anti-Iraq war. If he/she is put into office, the civilians would expect a withdrawal of troops. This would conflict with the NWO agenda to maintain bases in Iraq as headquarters for Middle Eastern operations. Not to mention that the disgruntled soldiers will have discovered that their families' freedoms are being savagely stripped away. Keeping the soldiers in Iraq is in their best interest. They do not wish for more Americans with knowledge of guns to be in the country when martial law is declared. We will not see a full withdrawal of US troops. Most likely another 9/11 will take place before Bush's second
term is over so that he can become dictator of the state, which means martial law will be effective before Jan. 20, 2009).

Increased international tensions or economic crisis (big disaster)

Martial Law

North American Union

World War Three

Anti-Christ

One World Government

Is this the correct order? Did I miss anything?

[edit on 13-2-2008 by wolfwood290]

you missed the plutonium powered spy satellite falling on a US city, the lucifer project, and the midwest earthquake triggered by HAARP for 2008.

edit: oh and a bird flu outbreak

[edit on 13-2-2008 by aaaauroraaaaa]

Hillary was at the last Bilderberg meeting in Canada.
She is very much in line with Bush no matter what it appears. They are on the same page as is McCain.
The only way I see your scenario playing out is if Obama wins the democratic nominee. Not sure if this will trigger they`re plan B or if they`ll wait to see if he actually wins election before they act.
Also there is also the possibility that a VP candidate has worked his way into Obama`s trust and could take the presidency should they off Obama.
Just my 2 cents.

Originally posted by csulli456
Hillary was at the last Bilderberg meeting in Canada.

The only way I see your scenario playing out is if Obama wins the democratic nominee.

lol interesting...

belief in NWO/Bilderberg but not the outright rigging of elections?

Before declaring martial law, the surveillance bill would have to be passed. This allows the government to have an excuse to weed out their remaining enemies throughout the country. CIA red, blue, and yellow list will be used in conjunction with this bill.

news.yahoo.com...

Once the "traitors" (patriots, conspiracy theorists) have been exterminated, the right to bear arms needs to be recalled. Only then will martial law have a reasonable chance at success.

We need to watch out for that surveillance bill being passed as well as further infringements on gun rights. These two obstacles MUST be overcome prior to a second 9/11 for bringing martial law to the US.

There will be another 9/11 type disaster, Bush admits it himself here:

WASHINGTON - President Bush pressured the House on Wednesday to pass new rules for monitoring terrorists' communications, saying "terrorists are planning new attacks on our country ... that will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison." (beginning of article)

reply to post by csulli456


Just out of curiosity, do you happen to have the agenda, and minutes from the most recent Bilderberg meeting? I'm curious as to what they actually discuss/plan at their conferences. Perhaps you can share some insight.

Originally posted by BlueRaja
reply to post by csulli456

 

Just out of curiosity, do you happen to have the agenda, and minutes from the most recent Bilderberg meeting? I'm curious as to what they actually discuss/plan at their conferences. Perhaps you can share some insight.

Ahh, no. Saw a video clip from FAUX News awhile back. According to some tard on Fox, "your average person would be bored with the specifics as to what is discussed in their meetings. It is too cut and dry and really fairly uninteresting." What a load of BS, it may be "dry" but it has everything to do with the world my kids are coming up in and I will leave before they do.

BlueRaja...that is a silly question, for you to even think someone out there is going to provide that information is so unrealistic! Secret societies want to stay secret and I am sure they are pissed off already that people even know they have meetings or have a (um, secret!) agenda.

[edit on 13-2-2008 by percievedreality]

reply to post by wolfwood290


I totally disagree. There is no need to wait for those other "civil-liberty stripping laws" to be passed. The way the laws have been rewritten, martial law alone gives them all the authority they need.

Did you know that during Katrina, while martial law was in effect in New Orleans, government authorities DID take guns from people? I am not taking about crack-head Bob running around with his gun looting and stuff, I am talking about people who legally own a registed firearm! Meanwhile, Blackwater was shooting people that were trapped in the chaos.......call it a test run for what will happen later this year.

Originally posted by percievedreality

Originally posted by BlueRaja
reply to post by csulli456

 

Just out of curiosity, do you happen to have the agenda, and minutes from the most recent Bilderberg meeting? I'm curious as to what they actually discuss/plan at their conferences. Perhaps you can share some insight.

Ahh, no. Saw a video clip from FAUX News awhile back. According to some tard on Fox, "your average person would be bored with the specifics as to what is discussed in their meetings. It is too cut and dry and really fairly uninteresting." What a load of BS, it may be "dry" but it has everything to do with the world my kids are coming up in and I will leave before they do.

BlueRaja...that is a silly question, for you to even think someone out there is going to provide that information is so unrealistic! Secret societies want to stay secret and I am sure they are pissed off already that people even know they have meetings or have a (um, secret!) agenda.

[edit on 13-2-2008 by percievedreality]

So without knowing what goes on at these meetings, you're gonna speculate that something bad must be going on at them? I'm not saying that something bad may not in fact be going on, but before I commit to that assertion, I'd like to feel reasonably confident that I know what I'm talking about.

reply to post by BlueRaja


Yes I am. This is a group of the worlds' most elite humans, gathering in secret, talking about secret things, things like pressing certain beliefs, values, and agendas that they have decided upon. Just because you are in a "democracy" doesn't mean they aren't going to force them on you.

I am not going into a long rant here about why the Bilderbergs are not to be trusted. Do some research and you should also be able to come to that conclusion. For starters why don't you look into some published quotes from the Rockerfellers and Rothchilds....scary stuff. This is nothing new, their agenda has progressed nicely for decades! Power and money, it would seem, make you above the other laws passed by fellow mankind.

Originally posted by percievedreality
reply to post by wolfwood290

 

Did you know that during Katrina, while martial law was in effect in New Orleans, government authorities DID take guns from people? I am not taking about crack-head Bob running around with his gun looting and stuff, I am talking about people who legally own a registed firearm! Meanwhile, Blackwater was shooting people that were trapped in the chaos.......call it a test run for what will happen later this year.

Have you got any links with more information on that? I've not heard of that before, and it sounds extremely interesting.


I'm inclined to think that after the debacle in New Orleans, people will be slightly desensitized to the suffering if another such event should happen in a localised area. They'd likely think "Oh, it's just Katrina all over again" and leave it at that. All the media coverage will have taken at least some of the edge off the sympathy that the public feels. And of course, less sympathy means less interest, and would lead to a better environment for infringement of a citizen's rights.

Just because Clinton and Obama support the withdrawal of troops from Iraq doesn't mean that they will, or that it'll happen quickly. These things take time, of which there's more than enough to divert their attention to other, more pressing matters nationally.

Regardless, martial law wouldn't work right now. The population of the United States is over 300 million. The number of active military personnel is 1,426,713, plus 1,458,500 in reserves, for a total of 2,885,213 (300,000 of which are presently serving in Iraq). So that leaves about 2,600,000 to oppress over 300 million people. Those are not good odds. Granted, there's roughly 140 million available for service, but again that would take time. They can't just declare martial law and start drafting anyone and everyone, especially to oppress their own people. They're having a hard enough time with the 30 million people in Iraq.

Extremely drastic measures would have to be taken beforehand.

reply to post by DeadAlready

Why do you think there are so many troops from other countries in the States right now? They're calling it the 'Peace Keeper Exchange Program', or something like that, and they've all brought thier own weapons. Foreign troops would have no problem rounding up Americans and the numbers, or odds as you put it, may not be overwhelming but if only one side is armed that would certainly tip the scales don't you think?
I'm sure it would be orchestrated in such a way that a bunch of unorganized citizens couldn't possibly mount any sort of a defense to make any difference. What do you suppose they're going to do with the 300,000 doses of the small-pox virus they've recently purchased? I'm sure there are a great number of other little surprizes they have in store for us. Divide and conquer. After all, they are looking to reduce the worlds population by as much as 80% to a 'Sustainable number'.
They've already got the concentration camps built to house the masses like the million acre facility only 67 miles, or kms. I forget, outside of Fairbanks Alaska. There's another very large one in Beachgrove Indiana, among others I'm sure, but these are already in place. It may just be a great deal closer than we think. Sleep well everyone.

I don't know why they play this game in the first place. Why don't they send troops into everyone's house so that they can throw everyone into cages, or line us up for mass murder. They can also take all our money and valuables while their at it. They can use our money to fill swimming pools so they can swim in our money, and walk around in money suits, and drive cars made out of diamonds and gold and wipe their ass with $10k bills.

Just a comment about Hillary. She said last year that she sees a presence of American troops in Iraq for an undetrminable amount of time. Obama said last year that he doesn't care if there is genocide in Iraq, he is more interested in attacking Pakistan, a country of 170 million as opposed to 17 million or so in Iraq. Interestingly enough, we must get our supplies to Northwestern Pakistan and also into Afghanistan by going through, ut oh, Pakistan. War isn't over if the NeoDems are elected. Business as usual. Bilderbergers, CRF, NWO, Illuninati. They are all the same. I don't understand their agenda. How will they control China and Russia and decimate their populations by 80%? Oh, yes, Bird Flu. Aids isn't working fast enough. Just some paranoid musings. Thank God I am old and will die soon. But, rest assured, I will be back stronger and younger than ever!!!!

reply to post by kyred


How will they control China and Russia and decimate their populations by 80%?

well, if you actually take a look at China behind the scnes of mainstream media and the 2008 olympics where everything seems happy and good, you realise that the Chinese are among some of the most oppressed peoples in the world, the Chinese government has a demonic grip of its people and rules with "question it and you die" tactics. Thousands of people are executed in China every day, mainly through reasons of religious beleive, they then harvest their organs and sell them to wealthy bidders who require them. Quite a grusome country to live in to say the least, the NWO has no problem with China at all, i think its all but too late for those people, despite how great they are in number. As for Russia, i believe they have illuminti infaltrated Mafia which keeps people in check, the Mafia in Russia is far more feared and powerful than the Russian civil services, i think thats how they achieve there, as for America you have the terror attacks and the freedom stripping that follows, you have a similar scenario in Britain, except Britian has the added "bonus" of enough CCTV camera's for one betwwen two people in the UK, the average UK citizen is on camera near enough 100% of the time once they have left their homes, and as for the rest of the world, NWO induced poverty, disease and famine do their part nicley.

guess we were waaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy off.

didn't notice that earthquake..............