Great Pic of a triangle in Indiana !!

reply to post by Bspiracy


I misunderstood your overlay then. It looks to be the exact same object but with the addition of the row of lights underneath it which is a very easy thing to add.

From what I can see in you overlay the lights are in the exact same spots across the front, but with less light aura in the new one, am I not seeing that correctly?

In any case, this thing is a dead ringer for a known hoax, IMO, and as such there is little credence I can afford it. I don't think this has anything to do with what people are seeing either. May an artist has created renderings of witness testimony, the honest artists don't try to pass their renderings off as the real McCoy though.

I agree with ZeroGhost when he says hoaxes poison the spirit of investigation and honest reporting of bizarre sightings and that's exactly why we don't suffer them well here.

If you take notice of the new paragraph of text above every page in this forum you'll see that we seek an environment where honest people can share their sightings with no fear of ridicule and the hope of getting clarification if possible in a civil and friendly way.

We are doing MUCH behind the scenes to build The Above Network into the genuinely ethical media company society needs, IMHO, right now. We have a multi faceted business plan that we have been executing for almost a year now and we are ahead of schedule on few of the very major/important initiatives needed to get us there. This won't become evident to those outside the inner circle of management for a while longer but rest assured it is coming and it's coming in a big and meaningful way.

Springer...

to add next page... grrrr

That image is a hoax, this is obviously the real one.

As you can see the UFO from Portsmouth was trying to ask the triangle for directions.



Apparently the UFO from Portsmouth got some after market lights put on his ship, from the looks of them I think they are Hella®.

Originally posted by Springer
reply to post by Bspiracy

 

I misunderstood your overlay then. It looks to be the exact same object but with the addition of the row of lights underneath it which is a very easy thing to add.

From what I can see in you overlay the lights are in the exact same spots across the front, but with less light aura in the new one, am I not seeing that correctly?

Springer...

Hrm.. I don't see how you can get the overlay wrong. While the lights are definitely close, the two end lights are matched up. The middle lights are off center from each other and more top or more to the bottom.

Also hard to accomplish is to lower the top dark edge of the china ufo that goes above the middle lights to a level that is below the top row of middle lights. It's hard to keep the integrity of the illumination if you were to do this. I painted the outlines with different colors and if it were a match, then you wouldn't see four different colors. Much less the center lights of the new ship off center than the china. Any "squish" or distort just can't find a way to keep all edges the same and the center points of all lights the same as well without taking away from the china ufo which back to earlier in the paragraph, that's actually difficult.

of course that's much to do about nothing because creating a new triangle shape and then adding lights would be 100 times easier than copy pasting, removing dark edges compared to the light positions and then overlaying.. Details are key and true or hoax, the point about this being the china ufo is just not true.

What are the chances of this happening like this? that's hard to say. the question is do you believe that this triangle craft exists after all the testimony floating around? If so, then I want to exhaust my view. I'm done with the projects and will head on to make my already debunked vid

b

Originally posted by samureyed
That image is a hoax, this is obviously the real one.

Gave you a star for the timing on that one.. if I would have saw it before I made and uploaded this I would have brought it into the video to illustrate a couple of other points..

here's the video. More points could have been made but I tried to keep it short and within layman's range and concept. Will this change anyone's mind? probably not..
enjoy the show


b

Originally posted by Bspiracy
the point about this being the china ufo is just not true.

China UFO overlaid with vivid light to show absolute light hot spot alignment.




I'm done making the point. I cant get more obvious.

Originally posted by jritzmann
the point about this being the china ufo is just not true.

China UFO overlaid with vivid light to show absolute light hot spot alignment.

I'm done making the point. I cant get more obvious.


Ok, your image gave me three seizures before I was able to finish posting this.
Yours is completely overpowering the MUFON image and I'm seeing bright spots when i walk around..

I tried to be exact as far as highlighting the actual lights and putting them on top of each other. Also the shape of the craft was highlighted. Without a seizure based display, I don't see a match. my image is clear as far as outlining the exact amount of light.

Can you tell me what was wrong with the way I did it compared to yours ?
Anyone for that matter..

b

Originally posted by Alpha Grey
here's a great pic someone took of a "triangle" in Indiana !
Article here: Triangle Article
here's the pic:

Enjoy !! Opinions anyone ??

Oi!
That looks like my Frisbee that I lost!
I'd like that back please!

No seriously, it looks half-way decent.
Under what conditions was this pic taken?
In other words, what brought the photographer's attention to this object?

The speed of the gif will show you the light sources aren't moving. The source spots are the same. There is an amount of loss in brightness in the lights since being composited into the Indy photo. I think this is where the discrepancy you're seeing is.

I see no difference in lighting position. If you do, thats ok. As far as I'm concerned, from what I see, it's lifted from the china UFO, and it's just that simple.

reply to post by jritzmann


Aight.. I guess this is where we have to disagree.
Reason being : If you shrink the side lights due to "dimming" and the said side lights match for both craft when placed on top of each other, why don't they do that in the other lights?
If you "scale" a sphere on itself, the smaller scaled sphere should be center of it's parent. A group of sphere(light auras) should do the same.
I didn't "vivid light" "screen" "overlay" or whatever other high-key RGB additive layer overlay of choice, I highlighted the lights themselves..
I also put cross hairs on the center of ALL the lights after reading your staunch view, matched the two sides and still it didn't match up. I distorted, shrunk and what not.. still no match when you add the crafts outlines.
without a doubt they are close though.

Believe it or not, it's actually a hard thing for me to do to disagree after you had me look hard enough into the wedding cake ship to debunk it in my own way. You're a bad@ss in your own right and of course no one can dispute that. Hopefully a mod doesn't filter that because it's a real statement instead of a reactive statement.

No need to answer as I'm sure you think I 'want" or "have" to believe. I don't "believe" though, I just don't think it's the same china ufo image. I'm sure we could share a beer or two. rootbeer if that's how you roll..
I prefer Killians draft btw.

peace

b

p.s. I'm sure that you believe that there is an ET presence and I'm also sure you agree that this is where the concept of lying is one of the most horrendous offenses a person can commit. It's worse than stealing because it steals more than one persons time in many ways over stupid issues like this because we as people who strive to excel in what we do also strive to know what is true.

double peace,

b

Originally posted by Bspiracy
p.s. I'm sure that you believe that there is an ET presence and I'm also sure you agree that this is where the concept of lying is one of the most horrendous offenses a person can commit. It's worse than stealing because it steals more than one persons time in many ways over stupid issues like this because we as people who strive to excel in what we do also strive to know what is true.

Absolutely right. Although, I'm not relegating this whole thing to "ET" yet, as there's just too many other possibilities.

It's not just about stealing time, and effort, it's about making this whole thing out to be a joke. It's why this subject isn't being taken as seriously as it could be.

On that I'm sure we agree. As far as this shot...not so much.

But thats ok. It's a garbage photo, and hardly a clear picture. So who cares. I think we just approach things from different ways, but I believe ultimately we end up in the same spot.

This shot, is nothing for anyone to get bent about. I mean look at it.

That said, I stand by what I see in regard to it. And no animosity here. You're a good Joe, and we can disagree.

B2 bomber probably landing....

There's lots of activity like this in Indiana. Back in the mid 80's myself and six other witnesses watched two AF jets, afterburners on, and a spotter plane come overhead over I275 in SW Ohio, LOW thru Greater Cincy Airport airspace ( hurt ears) heading for two lights that had been hovering in SE Indiana. As the jets approached the lights took off, came at our position overhead so fast that they looked like the light streaks left by meteors. This from a standing start, after our observing them hovering for over 20 mins with side-to-side movement and flashing occasional brilliant pure red light during the hover. These light flashes was what got our attention in the first place. The jets split and turned to follow, but they were BADLY outclassed. Reported it to MUFON but had no followup. Closest air base was Wright Pat.

If the lights are max points on some horizontal antenna,
we have a relationship between the physical dimension
(mean circular... old saucer or triangle or any except cigar or
multiple array as apparently came over Texas) these hot spots
show up.

frequency of the rigid air wave = (982M feet/second, the speed of light)
divided by
(ship mean diameter times
sine( 360 degrees / 2 x number of
max flares)

So any of the electro craft can spark around the sides due to the
million volt horizontal antenna.

So a 60 foot mean diameter craft has a control frequency of 327MHz.

reply to post by jritzmann

Hi
Did you check this Milwaukee,Wisconsin Ufo video with triangle pics with and with out filter www.ufoblogger.blogspot.com

..obviously the OP Alpha Grey is a hit-and -run special disInfo poster.
he isn´t showing up anymore.
guys, dont get TOO excited here..

Am I missing it or are we slill lacking any info from the person who took the pictures? A location and direction of shot would be a nice start. Like I said I'm in Indiana camping every weekend and ususlly outdoord till quite late( Lots of warm cloths and a fire). I just picked up a 500x lens for my Nikon and will be sitting out on the hill again this weekend.

mikell

Originally posted by anti72
..obviously the OP Alpha Grey is a hit-and -run special disInfo poster.
he isn´t showing up anymore.
guys, dont get TOO excited here..

No...I am NOT a hit and run poster !!

I have been busy with family business...is that ok ??

I try to come here daily if I can.






Now onto this picture ....now I can see it is an obvious fake !! That's why I posted this here...I knew you guys would ferret this out !!

Thanks to all who worked hard to figure this out !!






[edit on 19-2-2008 by Alpha Grey]

reply to post by mikellmikell


I live in central Indy and have been trying to find some additional information on this. I found the mufon listing but nothing on the Indiana mufon sight. I emailed Indiana mufon to see if they have any information, but I don't think we will get any on this.

reply to post by hsur2112


HERE you can find the submitter's description

and HERE you can find the image.



[edit on 19/2/2008 by internos]