posted on Feb, 10 2008 @ 10:43 AM
Originally posted by BlueRaja
Oh to be a teenager again and know it all. The way to have a meaningful discussion is to present a well reasoned argument for your case, with
citations to back your claims up. Telling the teacher they're an idiot in front of the class(which is basically what the gist of your remark) is not
the preferred method of debate.
Couldn't agree more, but we all know that there is no way to reason with a fool OR a zealot... Consider this story of my "all knowing" youth if you
will.
I went to parochial school, and was in the religion class when the Pontiff was visiting a nearby city. Focus of the class was shifted firmly in the
direction of his visit. (This was JP II, by the way.)
For some reason, the sister teaching the class brought up the "Popemobile". You know- the "tank" of a car that the Pontiff rides around in with
all the armor and the bullet-proof "bubble" on the top. (Yes, I SO want one of my own!!!)
My smarmy little teen hand went up at some point, and I was promptly called upon... here was my opportunity to point out fallacy!
"Sister?" I asked, "Isn't the Pope God's representative here among us? Isn't he Holy and infallable?"
"That's right" the unsuspecting penguin retorted.
"Then why all the armor and bulletproof glass? Is he scared to die, or WHERE he may end up in the afterlife?" I followed, smiling.
I spent 5 days in ISS (In School Suspension) for that one, and was a "marked man" in that school thereafter.
It's a funny story, but I don't feel I accomplished anything but planting a seed of doubt into other impressionable youths. I certainly did not
shake the faith of the instructor, but I did manage to raise her blood pressure.
Like I said- choose your battles.
[edit on 10/2/08 by cbianchi513]