posted on Feb, 9 2008 @ 05:25 PM
reply to post by mister.old.school
Well, perhaps he was applying the same kind of open-mindedness that we strive to apply on this site, to accept all possibilities, including the one
that perhaps the Anonymous sources were legit, in spite of the eventual flood of debunking that took place. Therefore he found it important to
continue pursuing that particular line of equiry.
One thing that strikes me from the earliest Project Camelot interviews (can't remember if he does this with Mr X - maybe he does?) but he asks the
interviewees if there is a possible connection between the Serpo story and their story.. however he later abandoned that line of questioning (probably
realising with the information coming to light via Camelot that there are bigger fishes to fry and so much more to fit into the big picture).
But y'know, having said that, there is a good chance there was an exchange program of some kind (think of the alleged Eisenhower-EBE meeting from the
early 50s etc) and so maybe there's a 5% truth element behind the Serpo bunk (remember what Richard Hoagland in his Project Camelot video interview
says about the construction of the disinfo lie which involves a small dosage of the truth in there to make the lie digestible). It serves no
functional purpose to continue to vilify Bill Ryan - he's just a human like you and me searching for the truth.
[edit on 9-2-2008 by RiotComing]