Mars People,Animals and Fossils Pics

I already assumed that some folks with even average visual acuity can't see half of what I post as faces or animals or fossils.That I understand.But if one pic stands out as proving anything from what I've posted here on ATS,it's that Nasa didn't FAKE the straight line 10 foot beam in the sand.It's a straight artificial manufactured line thicker than your arm and longer than your body. Can you at least see a straight line?That's basic vision and basic understanding,without being negative. In case you can't see a straight line,it begins under the "0" in "10" and ends under the letter "H" in Straight,as in straight line artificially produced by highly evolved Mars People.If you still can't see the beam I'll gladly enhance it for you because it appears in about 4 huge high definition panoramas on Mars rovers site.Would you like to see all 4 panoramas with this artificial half buried beam? Who would put it there? Why would they abandon a 10 foot beam on Mars,and what is it made of? How can "armchairs" be so quick to dismiss evidence of intelligence on Mars?

reply to post by ArMaP


Maybe nothing, maybe alot. Having a class or doing something everyday can be more helpful than just making guesses or assumptions. Whether it is an earial photo or one a photo taken from closer to ground level, many things can look like somehting that it is not. Aeolian weathering can make many different shapes in the rock because it is not uniform in weathering.

reply to post by vze2xjjk


It still looks like a layer of shale to me. I am not dismissing this out of hand and not I am not an armchair geologist. If that line is 10 feet long, then it is what, about 4-inches thick? I have seen lots of shale or sandstone units like this.

reply to post by vze2xjjk


I have to tell you that some of the things you are posting make me feel like im having a really bad acid trip. And I have never done drugs.

Why do you have random pictures thrown in with your mars photos?

Why do you have Marvin the Martian in a picture? And why do you have a black man in two of your pictures? And then in another picture you have some crazy cartoon of people riding in jeep and some silly cartoon characters thrown in there. And then all of the trippy colors

This is a serious question: Is this thread a joke?

Im really confused as to the silly trippy things you are throwing into these pictures?

This last image isn't mine but she shows how many heads appear supported by a wispy stalk body.Perhaps the lower gravity makes those bodies possible.[ :

The body style is what I'm trying to relay here.They are uncomfortable to look at,which is why many people deny what they see.The evidence in a negative image is sometimes clearer in Nasa photos because masking doesn't work completely on all levels unless they simply BLACK out completely.Think of a light eraser vs spilling ink over a pencilled in drawing.Editing pics can take away a LOT of onfo,like the spilled black ink over a face,or just a light softening so as to meld the image into the background rock or molding a NEW ROCK that fits the face. The mound image we both agree is veru telling because it ideologically provides the animals with night shelter,which we all understand about Earth burrowing animals.That is a critical find,the "POP GOES THE WEASEL" effect for armchair critics.The animals now have a place to go. Not all critics are weasels,LOL.OOOPs I SLANGED ! Here's the HUT again just in front of all those inconvenient LADY and PET DRAGON fossils.This bed-sized animal probably wouldn't fit into a tiny HUT. A child could probably ride this animal's back like a pony.Unfortunately the legs are more like flippers in the front and nubs in the back.Its rectangular lower body is like a long rectangle,flipped over here so the underside of body shows.Imagine a DEFLATED NESSIE creature that has the bottom surface area shaped like a piece of 3ft x 5ft plywood with casters under it to slide across the ground,but those casters are moving nubs,miniature legs.I can't explain flippers on Mars,but the long thick neck and soccer ball sized head make this animal seem like a mini-brontosaur with a flat-bottomed body.Explaining it will take time and many more samples and puzzle pieces. One person alone is not going to have all the best puzzle pieces. Even the SCREAMING critics agree.

When I say I designed the Mars rovers,what I mean is they originated in my head 1987,after studying what the Russians did with MOON rovers and modifying those concepts.I did drawings of my concepts and labelled which devices I wanted on them,including a ONE MILLION DOLLAR device from Germany,alpha proton spectrometer which ,knowing Nasa was under a crunch financially(JPL,not the MILITARY) then they could ask the German Reichstag to donate it for science,and they would.That's a definite NOD to Germany that we KNOW where the ROCKET SCIENTISTS came from,and THANK YOU.

reply to post by vze2xjjk


Since I have spent many years viewing ground zero photos of Mars I have come to this conclusion. Mars is a testing ground for genetic engineering gone wild. I believe that artifical intelligence is creating artificial intelligence as in good robot bad robot. Have you ever noticed at the end of an episode on T.V. that a red robot appears and you here the words bad robot. This tiny robot is almost exactly like the robot with a rectangular head on Mars in 1976 standing near the Viking II lander.

These Sandmaries, tiny tiny hybrid humanoids, coexist with the cyborgs. A whole new creation down to the microscopic level called Microtechs exists also and this is beyond comprehension. I first detected them during the existing Spirit and Opportunity missions. Why do you think NASA has these grinders going into the rocks and rock beds? Yes NASA is looking for fossils but there are the highly intelligent Microtechs that are right before our eyes.

vze is on target and is showing you things that you can't believe or concieve being on the surface of Mars. Yes he is seeing these anomalies because I can see them and there is so much life before us on Mars and you can look at a pic 20 times and each time you can pick up on different lifeforms you missed visually each and every time. What you deem to be odd shaped rocks are not, they are lifeforms and you can take it to the bank. When viewing take it slow you are not in a race.

If you will look for very tiny tiny anomalies you will most of the time see the extremely tiny letter S that is on many of the lifeforms and statues. This is like a tatoo, branding or insignia and you do not have to believe what I am telling you just look for yourself.

Remember what I have told everyone for those that can not see these anomalies you are being blinded by the light. Take your hand and cup it making a fist open your fingers slightly where you can look thru the tunnel of your hand and the opening should now be a little smaller then the size of a pea. Then hold your hand up to your favorite eye for viewing and this blocks out the reflecting light that blinds you. Now you will be able to see things you did not think possible On Mars as well as the Earth's Moon. Happy scanning, Rik Riley













[edit on 10-2-2008 by rikriley]

reply to post by vze2xjjk


I can see what you call "beam", but I don't agree with your interpretation of what that thing is.

You say that it is artificial and manufactured, but you don't have any more proof that this is true than I have proof that this is just a slab of shale like rock, in the same way I think that the following image (from the same panoramic image) is just another example of that.

You even say that the "beam" was produced by "highly evolved Mars People", for which you have even less proof.

Those straight line features are relatively common on Mars, if you look at some of the images from the rovers you will see them.

May I ask why you are using extremely LOW resolution photos to try and show us all this stuff you say you see in the pics? Would high res pics not help you prove your point?

I fear that any high res versions of the pics would show that you are blatantly making things up, so you use the lowest resolution you can find (or create).

This thread is not in skunkworks why?

Hi vze2xjjk

Great thread
You mention some sort of insignia and branding. I think i saw one on a rock. Kinda looks like the insignia on that guys forehead off stargate.

Do you have a compilation of these brandings for our viewing?

cheers

Man, those images are giving me a migraine headache. Anyway, I just thought I'd drop in and make my boilerplate comment:

Got anything else besides the images to back up what you're saying about the possible origin or use of these "objects" you're pointing out? No? Didn't think so. Thanks for playing.

reply to post by rikriley


could you please explain the red robots you see on tv?

I have watched more than my share of tv in my lifetime, and I never recall seeing a red robot and neither words or audio of bad robot.

Which country is this robot appearing in? Maybe it is a cultural/regional thing?

What shows are concluding with this, what stations? Maybe a station/show I don't receive/watch?




Sometimes, I see some of the things presented, sometimes they look like rocks, pixelation, and the cloud thing. I am quite open-minded, but, you can't show completely distorted images and expect people to agree with you.

Also, I will back GreenEyed on the fact that I feel like someone slipped me some tainted mushrooms from some of the posts. Colors, flips, rotations, then all of a sudden marvin martian and other characters ...

I think you will do yourself and your cause more justice by showing things in a professional and clear way on ATS. A photo or two at a time. The flips and stuff are ok, in moderation. You are giving some people an optic overload ... and possibly need to put a seizure warning at the beginning of the thread (I kid, I kid).


So please, explain the robots rk and ... o.p. try to make the posts and pictures easier on the eyes.

reply to post by FreeThinkerIdealist


I think rikriley is talking about Bad Robot Productions' logo that can be seen in the end of their productions.

reply to post by FreeThinkerIdealist


FreethinkerIdealist, thank you for your comments. ArMap is correct the Red Robot comes from Bad Robot Productions Logo.

Credit for most the photo posts on this thread goes to vze2xjjk I have given my comments and opinions. ArMap is always a great contributor to these type of threads he keeps you on your toes. Rik Riley

Since I don't like to type a lot and feel rushed to get the rellevant pics to you,I was filling a request for the Marvin the Martian pics to show quite candidly I was being mocked by friends who sent them to me of VIKING images where I searched hard and found animal faces.So you see,someone challenged me as a joke,never thinking that I'd even bother to look for "beings" in the photos. I was working with only 2004 images from the overload of both rovers at the time,and it hit me that Nasa must have masked images during Viking also if these same number and variety of animals existed at the VIKING sites 1975-76(and later).In other words I was gathering eveidence there,and not even bothering to go to the VIKING images,since I was swamped with Spririt and Op,which you will note are MY BABIES,since 1987.Do you want words from me or pics?

reply to post by vze2xjjk


vxe, keep the photos coming we enjoy what you bring to the table and also like your comments. What you see and present is no surprise to me because I have also been seeing the anomalies for years. Rik Riely

I can see that most of you believe you are too sharrp for Nasa to pull the wool over your eyes and HOAX or PUNK you.They just would never do that,RIGHT?

Hey vze2xjjk, I put a face to the "martian" and highlighted the other entities around her. They are creatures of the light so it is to be expected that they have learned more about its properties than we have. In a photograph, the position of the entity is locked, if you alter the light value slightly (up or down) than that which is hidden will be revealed. They hide in plain sight, it is important that all "empty" space be tinted, They understand human idiosynchrocies and depend on us adhereing to them.Don't be surprised to see colored objects appear out of blank spaces in photos.

vze2xjjk

It would be great if you would post at least the links for the original images, as far as I know you may be using altered images (there was a band with this name, anyone remembers it?) and not original images.

Even when using original images, your work may be undermined by compression artifacts if you use JPG images.