posted on Feb, 8 2008 @ 07:52 AM
I have video of half a dozen ET post-separation events. None quite this "interesting". At 3:44, I see what some might describe as a "black
triangle" or space junk.
The venting itself is "standard operating procedure" and there are pressure relief valves that can vent hydrogen and oxygen but there is some
"wiggle-room" for speculation I'd speculate.
In the 122 event... watch the illumination invovled and consider the possible sources of light... at the same time consider that the 150 foot long
tank does have cameras and batteries for local transmission capabilities as evidenced by the ascent video of the orbiter belly on the way "up"... at
the same time consider the the ET moving from light into darkness could cool rapidly owing to the lack of solar heating and "maybe" should not vent
as spectacularly as seen - or at all at that specific time.
Watch it closely... some areas of the tank do have unusual illumination near the area of the venting. Check External Tank drawings... the area of
venting shown in the video isn't from the inter-tank area exactly which is where one would expect venting to emanate from.
NASA does say that venting is used to "tumble" the ET away from the orbiter... why the fascination with this NASA... it's not like they don't get
extremely detailed video and stills from the two astros earlier, it's the very first thing done as soon as the astros unbuckle from the trip
uphill.
The ETs are not recovered and burn up during re-entry. Let's hypothesis that the USA has a covert space capability outside of the STS... could the
ETs be "target practice" for an anti-sat directed energy weapons system coming from a "Blackstar-like" evolution "pop-up"? What effects could a
directed energy system produce on a target like the STS External tank? If there was such testing would it be documented for "research" purposes?
So... what's going on? Nothing? OK... if NASA says so and they do say "so" regularly. They're NASA, they're the ones with the data. We just get
to watch...
I've talked to several other enthusiasts about the "trip" up, three to one that Atlantis lost fire on her port-side lower SME. They did use the OMS
jets to separate and these thrust systems are integrated... some of us think NASA "smoothed over" the loss of an SME just prior to SRB sep... they
can tell whatever story they like and very few will question their explanations or even ask about anything "tough" as they don't want to lose their
media credentials at NASA.
Buncha other little things this flight...
Cheers,
Vic
[edit on 8-2-2008 by V Kaminski]