It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by COOL HAND
One location? What kind of secret program has a single point of failure approach to it.
Originally posted by COOL HAND
Then surely you can pull up any and all suspicious reports from those areas and then correlate them with a launch event. I will wait while you pull that all together.
Originally posted by COOL HAND
You don't think that certain countries would love to expose a program like this to make people further question their government?
Originally posted by COOL HAND
Other countries inform us when they have secret launches (no such thing) so that we know what they are doing. You wouldn't want us to starting lobbing nukes because someone put another spy sat in orbit, would you?
Originally posted by COOL HAND
Whatever, where is the proof of that? Give me a program name or something.
Originally posted by COOL HAND
With a telescope and camera.
Originally posted by NovusOrdoMundi
Nice approach. It's ashame it proves nothing for you.
Since you're going to play that game, you should probably do your own independent investigation and scan the world for any secret launch locations. You do that and report that you found none, I'll do it and report I found some, and we'll compare it.
See, this would have some importance if you had gone through all suspicious reports yourself and found nothing that correlates with a launch event. Instead, you're speaking based completely on speculation. You know that it's impossible for us to go through every report, and you're taking advantage of that.
You don't think the US Government has secrets on countries like Russia or China that they would expose if Russia or China exposed the US?
In 2001, Dr. Evgeny Podkletnov began publishing a series of scientific papers detailing the experimental results of what he called an “impulse gravity generator”. The device reportedly produced hundreds of pounds of gravitational force in a non-diverging beam, capable of “punching holes through concrete and warping metal like hitting it with a sledgehammer”. Podkletnov further added that this beam produced no recoil on the superconducting emitter itself, and that a radiation had been produced behind the device creating a molecular juxtaposition between plastics, metals, and living tissues similar to that described in the Hutchison Effect.
Originally posted by COOL HAND
I am not the one making baseless claims here and then failing to back them up.
Originally posted by COOL HAND
Okay, I am done.
Originally posted by COOL HAND
How is it impossible to look up certain areas and see if you can correlate any strange sightings? Is this too much to ask of you?
Originally posted by COOL HAND
You are not making any sense here.
Originally posted by COOL HAND
Are you going to add something of subsistence to this discussion, or are you going to just keep wasting my time?
Originally posted by COOL HAND
It's time for you to put up or shut up.
Originally posted by COOL HAND
Show me some of your evidence that such a program exsists.
Originally posted by COOL HAND
Better yet, post both halves of the arguments so I don't have to.
Originally posted by NovusOrdoMundi
Please offer counter evidence to Mike's post or stop wasting your time posting.
Originally posted by COOL HAND
As I said before, we have discussed this very SAME TOPIC in several other forums here at ATS.
Originally posted by NovusOrdoMundi
I find it extremely hard to believe that a $16 billion NASA budget satisfies everything we do and intend to do in space. NASA really does nothing of importance that we know about. Do you truly think our government is that un-interested in space exploration and experiments?
Originally posted by COOL HAND
Yes they are that uninterested. Because the citizens who elect them are (for the most part) that uninterested.
Originally posted by Royal76
reply to post by mikesingh
There are things that we don't need to know about until we need them. The military will always do things to safe guard us that they won't tell us because they don't want our enemy's to know. When ever you find out about something like this its because its already so old they don't really care.
Originally posted by dj05544
I always knew NASA was a front to the american public....probably much like many of the burea's of investigation and criminal acts....
I had heard something about trips to venus, mars, and etc.
Its such a shame to see that if NASA is just a front...that all 17 astronauts that died in shuttle explosions- died because of lies..
Those "secret" space stations are the ones to worry about...what are they doing up there??? Besides building lasers for god knows what....
Originally posted by secret titan
Originally posted by kindred
Don't know if anyone has brought this up, but if the US Military has it's own secret space program, then why haven't they used their fancy technology to retrieve their secret spy satellite that is apparently spinning out of control and crashing back to Earth. Surely if they had this tech, they would do everything in their power to save it.
It's cheaper to just let a failed satellite crash than to try to collect it in space. Just because they are making a big deal about it, doesn't mean they don't already have one up there to take it's place.
Originally posted by COOL HAND
For God's sake, another one of these topics? Are you kidding me?
1. Where do these ships launch from?
2. Where are the eyewitness accounts of these launches? Where are the reports from other countries of launches that weren't predisclosed?
3. Where are they recruiting these secret astronauts from?
4. Where are the pictures of these secret stations in orbit? Why aren't other countries asking about unknown objects in orbit?
5. Why haven't any other countries attempted to put their own secret stations up there to monitor ours?
Start with those, if you can answer them we can hit you with the others that no one else here can answer.
Deny Ignorance, don't embrace it.
[edit on 28/1/08 by COOL HAND]