Proported Loch Ness Monster Video

Your insane
Thats nothing!!




[Edited on 12-2-2004 by Jethro]

I will try my best, might take a while though, Ill post a new topic when i get my hands on them.

Jethro you ape. It said judge for yourself. Nobody needs your juvenile commentary with no substance.

Aren't you cleaver Jethro, next time try to say something worth while instead of tying to pad your ATS stats.

I hate people like you.

I have seen Jethro around for a while. He has a problem getting along with others and only wishes to start fights. Usually his points are negative.

www.geocities.com...

Thats the site of Dan's. Hes the one who taped the Ogopogo twice. The second one I havent seen in real time but the first one I was at a party, and It looks real to me(as in not a wave). Iam looking for other videos that Ive seen over the years. Oh ya it was Sally Jessie Raphiel that he was on.

collections.ic.gc.ca...

www.geocities.com...

collections.ic.gc.ca...

www.strangemag.com...

communityinternet.com...

www.cryptozoology.st...


STICK THAT IN YOUR PIPE AND SMOKE IT JETHRO!

[Edited on 12-2-2004 by HumptyDumpty]

I dont really think this warrents any of our time.


Firstly, I did wonder why they were American, then of course I realised the American love for a good mystery and myth, then a realised the American talent for cinematography.

If there was real footage of clear Nessie sightings, like this taken, believe me we would know about it. It would be all over the news. Dont give me any government conspiracy bollocks.

If a boat had hit something on Loch Ness and sunk, with a couple of missing persons on board. Again, we would have heard about it, it WOULD have been all over the news.

I think, as the guy who posted the news story says, this is a Blair Witch style fillum and I am pretty sure that this wasnt recorded on Ness, i'm not positive but puurrruuudddy sure.

Anything making news on this subject is worthy of scrutiny and should be posted for viewing within our community.

Originally posted by dreamrebel
Anything making news on this subject is worthy of scrutiny and should be posted for viewing within our community.

Your right.

I hope everyone sees the obvious holes here though and doesnt believe it.

It is fiction, if that subheading is there, I am happy.


p.s. not saying Nessie is fiction. My beliefs are that there was a monster in that lake, maybe even up to the 1050's but it was either killed, stolen or died naturally.

99% that it wasnt stolen or someone would be making a pretty penny.

I personally agree with you. There may or may not be something in there. The videos I posted certainly are a long way from any form of proof. That said lake monsters are surely a tourist draw. These videos are chinsey at best. But we all deserve to see whatever is being touted as evidence. I feel sorry for anyone who declares the monster exists strictly off this.

Originally posted by dreamrebel
I personally agree with you. There may or may not be something in there. The videos I posted certainly are a long way from any form of proof. That said lake monsters are surely a tourist draw. These videos are chinsey at best. But we all deserve to see whatever is being touted as evidence. I feel sorry for anyone who declares the monster exists strictly off this.

I totally agree too. I have said in my posts that Ive never seen anything really conclusive either, but what I was making reference to was the movement of the Lake Ness Nessy and the movement of the Lake Okanogan Ogopogo in the videos that I posted and the video that Dreamreble posted. They do have a strickingly similar look.

Now the "acting" in the video of Dreamrebels is, quote "chinsey". I do agree it looks and some what sounds scripted. But either way I havn't herd of the videos being debunked, just inconclusive.

Sorry but What does "chinsey" mean?

I have actually never heard of tahtw ord and without wanting to sound as if i am blowing my own trumpet, my vocabulary is something I am quite proud of (though the opposite can be said for my spelling and grammer).

Is it an American slang word?

It means kinda fake. Yes American slang.

I wonder if the video could be one of these?


I found this on another forum entitle "weird pictures" or something. Submitter writes, "This picture of a sea serpent was taken off the coast of Australia. It's authenticity has not been verified." Obviously I think it could be something placed in the water but the shape and size seems to fit the profile for the Video's. Here's the link to the page for the info on the pic.

www.ghoststudy.com...







[Edited on 13-2-2004 by HumptyDumpty]

HumptyDumpty:

I think that one was reported to be a hoax, done by Robert Le Serrec...

On February 4th, I965, Le Serrec released his story, instantly stirring up worldwide interest - and, of course, skepticism. This time, even such an adventurous cryptozoologist as the Scottish-born Ivan T. Sanderson, an author and naturalist with a wide-ranging interest in unusual wildlife, had grave doubts. Although Le Serrec's colour photographs seemed genuine enough, his much-touted movies did not turn up for viewing by independent investigators, and rumour had it that they were hopelessly blurred and virtually useless. The sighting could not be explained on the basis of any known phenomenon, and investigators had to consider the definite possibility of an intentional hoax. Especially suspect, in the opinion of French-born cryptozoologist Bernard Heuvelmans, were the unique positioning of the animal's eyes, the handy removal of the children, who might have revealed the ruse, and the contradictory fact that the men were afraid to provoke the creature from the boat but not to approach it underwater.

Further disturbing facts emerged concerning Le Serrec himself. He was wanted by Interpol for leaving France, in 1960, with a lien on his yacht and for absconding with funds put up by would-be sailing companions, whom he left behind. Le Serrec had reportedly told them that he had an idea for bringing in a great deal of money - something "to do with the sea serpent."



freespace.virgin.net...

thanks for the info. I was just using that as a model anyway, but thanks.

Am i right in thinking that the first ever sighting of the Loch Ness monster was of it next to the loch,walking with an animal (deer?) under one arm and not actually in the loch?

If my memory is correct,does this mean that the first sighting was of another 'monster' or is it considered to be the same as what is often sighted in the Loch?

Thankyou for any replies