It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SteveAndrew
Well, his stance on the issues doesn't appeal to me. But it's good to have variety this go around. Instead of knowing the winner the first 2 or 3 states.
Originally posted by SteveAndrew
The Iraq War - I disagree with Paul. We should stay in Iraq and finish the job. It wasn't bad enough we went the 1st time and left. We are getting the job done, little by little but we are doing it.
Like same sex, Paul doesn't want to define it but I believe that should be a federal thing.
The I.R.S doesn't need a complete re haul, but some minor tweaks here and there.
Originally posted by SteveAndrew
I wholeheartedly believe we should stay there and finish the job of putting Iraq back on track and putting it in a top notch free nation.
I disagree with you on the abortion part. I think it is too important and should be left to the Federal Government.
I think you mean they should eliminate the I.R.S. I disagree with that. And on the Iraq spending, Romney will do the best job to finance the war correctly. Not just doing a half arse job like Bush.
Originally posted by SteveAndrew
I told you BN, we are progressing the country to make it a free and independent nation. There are so many people over there (terrorists and the sort) who will do anything and everything to stop that. We are kind of like the muscle - to move Iraq into a stable nation.
I disagree BN. But, thats not to say the states shouldn't decide some things. Which is what Romney agrees with. But, some issues are too delicate for the states and must be taken up and decided by the Feds.
Believe me, Romney would manipulate the funding so the taxes would not be raised and we would be the leading country in the world. Romney doesn't plan being there 100 years as Paul says. Maybe another 2 or 3 years and Iraq will be on track. Once it is, we will leave. Knowing full well we moved that country from a dictatorship to a democracy.
I have no idea how Romney will accurately fund the war, but, rest assured, he will and it won't launch us into this conundrum. Romney also believes in independence from China, but that's a whole different thread.
[edit on 18-1-2008 by SteveAndrew]
Originally posted by SteveAndrew
There is a small distortion BN. I said 'some' issues are too delicate for states. I'm a strong believer in states rights, but on some issues, the states have to be stripped of their decision and must be provided with the 'right' decision. I am pro life, and some states might choose to become pro choice. A choice I and my candidate feel is wrong.
Originally posted by SteveAndrew
I base my choice of abortion on the Constitution.
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
That part of the Constitution states that no person shall be deprived of life. That is what the Constitution says, and we should follow it.
Originally posted by SteveAndrew
Should not change what? I'm all for the Congress authorizing wars, but this was extenuating circumstances. It's like when Jefferson bought land off of Napoleon. He did it behind Congress' back, but it worked. And I'm certain we will lead Iraq to a better future. Besides, everybody thought that Iraq and its counterparts were behind it, and that the U.S was in major trouble. The United States had to act fast, for we all thought danger was looming for us.
On abortion, what else do you call a person? At any given time, a fetus (if that's what people want to call it) is a person. Once the woman knows she is pregnant, she shouldn't murder her child. She should either put it up for adoption or keep it. Simple, every single life is precious. You don't slay something that came because of your idiocy.
Although there are extenuating circumstances such as those outlined by Romney:
Opposes abortion rights except in cases of rape, incest and to protect the life of the mother.