It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
edit: I don't know the A-310, but most airliners have a VMO of around 340K at sea level...varies up or down depending on the airplane.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by darkbluesky
Yeah, yeah dbs....says you!!
Where's your proof? Because I bet I can find at least two people somewhere to point out all of teh 'flaws'...shadows all wrong, there was a giant spotlight..etc, etc...
Originally posted by dirtonwater
reply to post by gottago
Actually the question is not all 3 but is 3 out of 4 which is quite different.
[edit on 16-1-2008 by dirtonwater]
Originally posted by darkbluesky
reply to post by weedwhacker
Thanks WW.
I happen to be 100% positive the pic used in my avatar is authentic.
[edit on 1/16/2008 by darkbluesky]
Originally posted by OrionStars
That was 20' above ground at 400 mph not 20' in distance at 400 mph. Did you even bother to read the article? If you did, you certainly keep misinterpreting what the author did say.
Originally posted by OrionStars
If you knew all you said about flying you would have no problem agreeing with him.
Originally posted by OrionStars
It certainly does. It agrees with my understanding of the physics and quantum mechanics of aerodynamics very well. The author is an expert in aerodynamic engineeering. Something you admit you are not.
Originally posted by miragewsu
I'm sure people "determined" to carry out these attacks could have done the above. With some study... its totally possible.
Originally posted by SlightlyAbovePar
Originally posted by OrionStars
what you know about the physics and quantum mechanics of aerodynamics. You blatantly implied I was too stupid to know.
What is/are the "Quantum Mechanics of aerodynamics"?!
[edit on 16-1-2008 by SlightlyAbovePar]
Originally posted by gottago
Where does this fall on the scale between 10 being inevitable and 0 being impossible?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Well, I've sat here and read most of this and every time someone with actual aviation experience points out the errors in the Nila Sagadevan article they get hit with some of the silliest nonsense imaginable.
Nearly every part of Mr. Sagadevan's article is pure hogwash. He is intentionally misleading especially when talking about the weather conditions. It was a bright, beautiful cloudless sky that day! I know...I was there...about 3 miles from the Pentagon. And we've all seen the films from New York. So, along with his other assertions, that one stands out as the most blatant one to destroy his credibility.
I do not understand this continued insistence a 9/11 conspiracy exists, unless it's just to sell books...
Originally posted by Jeff Riff
I did a search and was not able to find this article discussed. I think that it raises some red flags to one that would believe the official story. Its a great read and I think its very important to the investigation of a truther.
www.lookingglassnews.org...