Bizarre statement from Fox Debate Moderator

Wow, glad to see my thread takeoff like this. Just to let you all know, I was joking about the reptilian comment. Notice the ... it was in jest.

I personally think the guy was reading a teleprompter and accidentally vocalized part of something we weren't supposed to hear. As to what "their way" means, your guess is as good as mine.

[edit on 14-1-2008 by mazzroth]

[edit on 14-1-2008 by mazzroth]

You are not missing much .

Sentence 2.

Originally posted by Golack

I personally think the guy was reading a teleprompter and accidentally vocalized part of something we weren't supposed to hear. As to what "their way" means, your guess is as good as mine.

I think he gets confused by the directors shouting trough his earpiece

...to me it looks a lot like he's simply stumbling over his words because he knew the phrasing of the question was incredibly rude. He didn't want to ask it like that.

Notice that he also calls Ron Paul "sir" twice? As if in apology?

Originally posted by racerzeke
That's really strange looking, I didnt notice anything until I looked at his mouth then I heard a faint "their way".... I have to say that that is really creepy

Only explanation I can think of is maybe he had something else on his mind or something-or he is a reptilian/being remote controlled

Reading his lips I also saw "out of the way". Maybe he was trying to tell people to get this Ron Paul guy "out of the way" of the main discourse by the "accepted" "viable" candidates. It is apparent to me that there is a MSM conspiracy to submerge and otherwise pay no attention to Ron Paul. This stinks to hight heaven. The MSM has and will continue to try to choose for us by asking if we want "A" or "B" or "C" and not mentioning that there is "D", "E....Z". I wish Ron Paul the very best of luck, as he will need it. BTW, the same is occuring on the demo side. MMSM is asking: who is the winner, Hil or Obam? Very, very premature and very, very controlled.

They are definitely trying to undermine him. RP's very first question, after asking Rudy, Thompson, McCain, and Romney about important issues, the same guy asks RP if he wants to reject his supporters who believe in a 9/11 conspiracy.

I'm not a RP supporter, but when they asked these two questions, it made me sick. I just though 'give me a break'. And they always have a split screen when he's talking, so you can see the smirk on the other candidates faces. I cry foul.



[edit on 14-1-2008 by DarkkHero]

[edit on 14-1-2008 by DarkkHero]

To me the moderators looked stoned or drunk. Maybe they had a few too many cocktails before the debate.

malfunction of the mic feed or it was censored indefinitely

Frankly i was creeped out by the guy's face and manner of staring into the camera, lack of any hint of a smile or amiability.

My guess is that he's not "reptilian" (thats all BS in my opinion anyway), but certainly not a good host either!

[edit on 15-1-2008 by 44soulslayer]

i guess the powerfull are warning thru the moderator so that ron paul doesnt act smart and spill the beans

[edit on 16-1-2008 by dracodie]

The guy has a stutter or some sort of other speech impediment. He does a little stutter again later on in the same clip. No mystery there...

I think the "their way" comment was probably apart of the notes that the speaker had written down to ask the certain questions to each canidate. But it was weird that he did that. Maybe the topic question on his paper was something like: "Is Ron Paul electible as a Republican even though he doesn't seem to see things their way?"
Just a thought though.
Nevertheless, with that sort of question that he asked Ron Paul, I think that the media is trying to catch him up and make him look bad.

A few questions:

1) Why did his tone of voice change when he said "their way" or whatever it was?

2) Why does everyone keep saying its a stutter of some sort? I thought a stutter was getting stuck at a part of a word, not muttering something under your breath in a weird tone.

3)Even if he does have a speech issue, why in the world would they pick him to speak on television in front of millions if that's true? Doesn't add up.

Also, I noticed that "their way" wasn't picked up in the captions.

I don't know if it's anything conspiracy-related, but it really is wierd...

Wow ! I watched that video, earlier, today, and when I tryed to find it , just now, it said "No Longer Available". That was the creepiest video I have ever seen. I creeps me out,too, that it would be removed. Network media people are nothing but whores.

Originally posted by jmdewey60
Wow ! I watched that video, earlier, today, and when I tryed to find it , just now, it said "No Longer Available". That was the creepiest video I have ever seen. I creeps me out,too, that it would be removed. Network media people are nothing but whores.

I just saw it at
www.youtube.com...
Worked fine.

I agree with you. These media whores are spoonfeeding the public on who to vote. Why don't these jerks ask Ghouiliani or Foghorn Leghorn the same question?

Getting elected "their way" means having the means to put yourself in a position where you are selected to be the next President by the elite. "Their way" is the way it has been done since JFK was assasinated. Ever since then the votes have been counted by a private company, without oversight, and then report their numbers directly to the media for broadcast (public consumption).

Ron Paul is more representative of the general
American attitude pre WWII.
Since I revere the Americans of that day, I am greatly offended by the way Mr Paul is being treated like a nut case by the media.

It shows how far America has fallen that we do not treat such a man with the respect which he deserves.

As far as the Reptilian joke is concerned, you were close enough, calling him a snake is an insult, to snakes!

I seriously think Ron Paul has some mental issues. I've watched him talk a few times and he can't seem to hold a train of thought. He rambles like a mad man. Why do you think people always smile and chuckle when he talks ?

The amazing thing to me is that he gets 5-8% support in the primaries. Do 5-8% of the people in this country really think this guy is anything but totally crackers ?