It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Eventually, Clinton stopped outside a bakery, offered some remarks, and took questions. As he was answering one on Iraq, one of the Paul backers interrupted and shouted that the Sept. 11 attacks were an inside job, and that the U.S. didn’t need to be in Iraq and Afghanistan.
When he dropped an F-bomb, the crowd booed. Clinton, who had tried to talk over the man, gave up.
"You wanna know what I think?” Clinton said. “You guys who think 9/11 was an inside job are crazy as hell. My wife was the senator from New York when that happened. I was down at Ground Zero. I saw the victims' families. You're nuts."
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
“You guys who think 9/11 was an inside job are crazy as hell."
Originally posted by defcon5
So what happens if I quote him in my signature line?
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
"You wanna know what I think?” Clinton said. “You guys who think 9/11 was an inside job are crazy as hell. My wife was the senator from New York when that happened. I was down at Ground Zero. I saw the victims' families. You're nuts."
Originally posted by bsbray11
It'd probably just make you look silly for spending so much of your time arguing so much with so many crazy people.
Originally posted by defcon5
Which could be why
Several Ron Paul supporters shadowed a much larger Clinton entourage as Bill Clinton greeted supporters downtown. Source
Originally posted by ipsedixit
Here's Clinton's smackdown of those scurrilous Lewinsky rumours. The ex-President is a polished speaker and can be very emphatic and convincing when he talks, but then I'm a sucker (no pun intended) for this sort of thing. [
his job approval rating hit its all-time peak, 69 percent, just after the Lewinsky scandal erupted, and then reached almost as high, 68 percent, immediately after the Senate acquitted him of impeachment charges.
Originally posted by defcon5
A prime example was the group who published fuel loads based on absolute minimum fuel needed to show their mathematical figures to be correct, when in reality most early morning flights are ballast fueled when they terminate the night before, and would be flying with almost full tanks.
The truth did not fit their theory, so they altered the facts and went printed the information as though it was factual.