It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Freeborn
Just tell it to me straight, I'm a big boy.
At least then I might be able to enter into some meaningful dialogue with you without having to waste my time trying to decipher your cryptic postings!
Originally posted by Freeborn
As for talking to Jesus, would do mate but he's been dead for about 2000years now, even if he did or did not die on the cross.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
It is possible that the spirit of prophesy has entered Crossbones. He could very well be writing under inspiration. I am sure Crossbones believes this. This sort of thing is not unusual, at all. I have witnessed plenty of prophesy spoken by people who were moved by the Holy Spirit. And usually it is spoken in the name of someone else. It is kind of like they are channelling someone. I do not recomend it to just anyone. And I do not think anyone can keep it up for very long.
[edit on 3-1-2008 by jmdewey60]
I am sure Crossbones believes this. This sort of thing is not unusual, at all. I have witnessed plenty of prophesy spoken by people who were moved by the Holy Spirit.
Originally posted by helen670
But, sadly this is NOT the Holy Spirit talking!
I can tell you in honesty, that todays world has more 'boasting and proud' people rather then 'Humble, prayerful and fasting' people
Originally posted by MajorMalfunction
There's no historical evidence for his (Jesus) existence whatsoever
“A papyrus believed to be the oldest extant fragment of the New Testament has been found in the Oxford Library ... It provides the first material evidence that the Gospel according to Matthew is an eyewitness account written by contemporaries of Christ.”
-The Times, Dec 24,1994
Originally posted by whitewave
Also, and this is an unprofessional observation, the style of writing exhibited by crossbones is uncannily similar to that of wisesheep.
I think you will find that the Magdelen Papyrus of Matthew dating by Carston Thiede is wrong as it is done through writing styles (which don't change year by year) and has been redated to ca. 200. see here While Thiede himself in his scholarly article places the fragment closer to 100 CE.
Originally posted by dbates
Oxford Library has a piece of parchment that has been dated to around 58 A.D. and they acknowledge that Matthew was most probably written by someone who was an eye-witness of the accounts in that book.
“A papyrus believed to be the oldest extant fragment of the New Testament has been found in the Oxford Library ... It provides the first material evidence that the Gospel according to Matthew is an eyewitness account written by contemporaries of Christ.”
-The Times, Dec 24,1994