It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by KilgoreTrout
reply to post by DocMoreau
As you so rightly put it, only with the end of profiteering will future generations enjoy the wonder that is this planet, but we need to remember that it is us that keeps buying the products, it takes every single one of us to stop. I, in gradual increments, have released myself from consumerism by the simple thought of, I may want it but do I need it. Invariably the answer is no.
We can't ruin this planet....no matter how hard we try, it heals itself just the way He designed it to.
Originally posted by Quazga
What's so wrong with profiteering? Are the organic farmers of the world not profiteers? Are the folks who run ATS not profiteers?
Originally posted by Quazga
You fail to realize the basis of the issue here. The earth has never had a utopian society. As a matter of fact society is the cause of all the issues you complain about. Although society affords us a lot of great benefits, like my HDTV or the 24" iMac I'm using, or the ability to get belgian beer at any local store here in Atlanta...
Originally posted by Quazga
...It also causes epidemics, plagues, wars, etc. But the beautiful thing is, that humans are adaptable and wil survive any social or unsocial dynamic as a whole.
Originally posted by DocMoreau
I think Global Warming is a serious issue, but I also think that there are too many Born Again Christian families of 5-7 people who cannot 'survive' without their big SUVs and McMansions for anything to be done. Until these sheeple can be forced to use cleaner cars, and live a less wasteful lifestyle, the earth is doomed.
"In every deliberation we must consider the impact on the seventh generation... even if it requires having skin as thick as the bark of a pine."
- Great Law of the Iroquois
A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.[1] To "set up a straw man" or "set up a straw man argument" is to create a position that is easy to refute, then attribute that position to the opponent.
Originally posted by DocMoreau
I think Global Warming is a serious issue, but I also think that there are too many Born Again Christian families of 5-7 people who cannot 'survive' without their big SUVs and McMansions for anything to be done.