I accidentally stumbled across this story on youtube. And I must admit that I have found a lot of it quite laughable. I am not a conspiracy theorist,
but I do question things. I dig when something interests me.
The so-called "FEMA prison camps" are a requirement for processing large numbers of people in the event of an outbreak, terrorist attack and yes,
civil unrest. It's a fact that these facilities would need to exist, in order to treat, register and transport people away from any danger zone.
If a dirty bomb went off in a heavily populated area, what do you think would be the first priority? Treating and evacuating. For that you'd need
secure locations where an orderly exodus can be initiated.
Why have then now, and ready to go? Because the US is the least popular Western nation right now (if not least popular globally). Sorry, but it's
true. We are all expecting another big attack, aren't we?
From what I have seen about the coffins, this is one location. I have not found any evidence that these things are spread out across the country.
There are not "millions" of coffins, there are a few thousand. Maybe they were ordered by FEMA (as one available document suggests) but perhaps this
was in relation to an event that didn't happen, or one that didn't end the way they may have expected? When something like 9/11 happens, or
Hurricane Katrina, the practicalities must be addressed immediately, and burial would be one of those, and it would be addressed by FEMA.
Shackle Trains is another thing that seems to have no substance behind it. I have seen NO evidence at all to suggest that these carriages exist.
NONE.
Sure there's a lot of talk about it, but talk isn't evidence.
Even the motivation behind something so ridiculous is absent. What do the government have to gain from this? Nothing.
In order to restore an economy you need a workforce, and for an economy the size of that in the US, that takes millions of people, the people so many
are convinced the government wants to kill!
The so-called "evidence" that military sites will be used to hold civilians is not accurate. There seem to be plans for military sites to use
existing civilian prisoners (ie, not military prisoners) for labor. That's just practicality. If you have thousands of prisoners incarcerated, why
not put them to work? I see nothing to suggest that they are planning to round people up and use them as slaves.
I've seen some rubbish about the Illuminati, New World Order... but again, what would motivate a person one hundred years ago to want this?
Apparently there was a plan hatched a century ago, or something, like they would care what happens a century into the future!?
Fact, FEMA is charged with responding to an emergency (the clue is in the title). Civil unrest, terrorism, disease outbreak etc are all emergencies.
For them to do that job they need evacuation plans, evacuation
sites, contingency plans, disposal methods... the list is endless.
The only thing that I have found that causes me to worry a little is the fact that the US President is able to declare Marshal Law, and that this does
indeed seem to allow FEMA to effectively control the entire nation.
They do have the power to seize every asset and control every mode of transport, every civilian, every company. It would basically mean that if
Marshal Law is in effect, FEMA own your ass. And with military assistance.
Basically, I'll be worried when Bush announces Marshal Law, but he doesn't have long, and I can't see anything happening in time for him to do it
now.