It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by golddragnet
reply to post by deltaboy
This is not like Iraq. The Pentagon was specifically looking for Bin Laden, a CNN reporter had just interviewed him, and then declared he was going to cause a massive attack on USA. If the Pentagon really was after Bin Laden, then they could have reached him the same as the CNN "doofus" reporter reached him. And they could have foiled the 9/11 disaster if they were doing their job.
Bill Cooper makes a very good point, and maybe you are not realising the full power, and the budget of the Pentagon, and what exactly they are supposed to be doing.
And by the way, Iraq is another issue, but as you brought it up, I don't think the US military want to prevent violence and terrorism in Iraq, they want the violence and death to continue, it gives them the best excuse not to leave the country, its why they went in their in the first place, to have a very powerful presence their. Having insurgents causing mayhem is exactly what they want. And they have been saying for a long time, they won't leave until there is peace in Iraq, so the last thing they want is peace in Iraq. Bush and the gang didn't go this far just to leave.
Originally posted by WhiteDevil013
reply to post by golddragnet
I believe that Bill Cooper knew many things, but I am confused as to why people think he predicted 9-11
I mean if he did really predict the exact day and time, wouldnt people think that he was still working for the govt?
Doesn't it strike you as odd that CNN reporters could go in there, and The Pentagon couldn't catch him, either before or after??? The Pentagon were supposed to be looking for him, wouldn't they have got wind of a CNN reporter going to interview him? Wouldn't they have been able to discover his movements etc
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by golddragnet
Doesn't it strike you as odd that CNN reporters could go in there, and The Pentagon couldn't catch him, either before or after??? The Pentagon were supposed to be looking for him, wouldn't they have got wind of a CNN reporter going to interview him? Wouldn't they have been able to discover his movements etc
The same CNN that agreed not to report negative stories about Saddam, Uday and Ousay? The same CNN that would not allow the coalition to debrief the CNN reporters who were the last Western reporters to leave Baghdad during Desert Storm?
Contrary to popular belief, US intelligence agencies do not know what is going on under every rock on the planet.