It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Matthew5012
The rockets that made the landing possible in the first place should have left quite a mess when the craft landed....they didn't, not on any of the photos or video's of the moon landings.
Originally posted by Terrapop
Well, well ... and what do you think about this offical picture of TWO moon buggy's on the moon at the same time:
history.nasa.gov...
Originally posted by WorldShadow
Looks to me like a cut and paste job. Look at the wheels of both boogies. they match in hub oriented position to hub oriented position flawlessly. Ya think the presentation of the photo would have at least cut and paste the wheels to look off some what from the duplicate.
Originally posted by tep200377
reply to post by bobbyt
So your strongest argument is that its _impossible_ for NASA to picture two buggies in the same photo because they state that each of the buggies was intended to be used in separate missions ?
I can't see how that is a strong argument ?
Originally posted by amitheone
At 15:35 No Blast Crater
You can't have blast crater when there is no oxygen. Without oxygen, there will be no traces of black oxides to be observed but only melted glass from heating the fine powder sand on the moon.
In space, you can only have an impression of a crater during a forceful impact by space debris, but not during a very carefully controlled landing and take off. All it does is sift the sand like a high pressure compressed air. The aircraft only weighs about 1/6th its original weight on Earth so you don't need that much energy to blast it off. A blast crater is totally impossible in this situation.
We are dealing with almost weightless (1/6th of Earth's gravity) and airless environment. We should not explain things according to what we experience on Earth. They are totally different environment.
Why all these conspiracies? Are they trying to skew the truth? Trying to hide something whats really on the moon?
Edit: Added info - 1/6th and airless
[edit on 6-12-2007 by amitheone]
Originally posted by blueyedevil666
wow..talk about insulting the ingenuity of man. Its already been busted, the idea that we never went to the moon and it was faked, why are people still harping on this topic? I suppose man wasn't clever enough to build any of the original 8 wonders of the world either? or that it wasn't a man at all that harnessed the power of the sun long before the digital age? or even that it wasn't a very gay man that conquered the known world by the tender age of 18? come on this thread/topic is insulting to the scientific community and you should be ashamed of yourself for believing we never went to the moon.
Originally posted by yahn goodey
reply to post by newworldnews2007
moon landing and walking on moon by usa faked ? i guess you might even think that if the japanese and chinese show us pictures of the footprints and equipment left behind that their pictures will be fakes also----------i dont think even the russians are the least bit sceptical about the usa's success.
Originally posted by defcon5
reply to post by yahn goodey
We don’t even need that proof, there is equipment that we left up there to measure the distance to the moon by bouncing laser beams off the reflectors.
Originally posted by Dr Love
I agree with your post 100%. To say that we "never" went is false. The footage shown to the public way back in the day was fake. We've been there, but it was done covertly, without the public's knowledge. There is a secret space program, of this I have no doubt. To what extent NASA's involved with it is another question.
Originally posted by WorldShadow
Originally posted by Terrapop
Well, well ... and what do you think about this offical picture of TWO moon buggy's on the moon at the same time:
history.nasa.gov...
Looks to me like a cut and paste job. Look at the wheels of both boogies. they match in hub oriented position to hub oriented position flawlessly. Ya think the presentation of the photo would have at least cut and paste the wheels to look off some what from the duplicate.
Originally posted by TLomon
Originally posted by WorldShadow
Looks to me like a cut and paste job. Look at the wheels of both boogies. they match in hub oriented position to hub oriented position flawlessly. Ya think the presentation of the photo would have at least cut and paste the wheels to look off some what from the duplicate.
But what about the rest of the vehicles? Cameras are at completely different angels. Equipment is not at the same angel. I also disagree with the wheels matching exactly. The left vehicle's rear axle appears to be a few more degrees counterclockwise. So, using cut and paste, they some how rotated the angles the cameras and equipment are at. Not sure I buy that...
Originally posted by Dr Love
reply to post by WorldShadow
I will disagree with the "cut and paste" job though. In all likelihood everything in those pictures are models. Each rover and astronaut is a duplicate, the only difference is that one of the astronauts' right arms was moved to make the picture look more authentic.
Peace
[edit on 7-12-2007 by Dr Love]