It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by snowflake_obsidian
I can't stand Marilyn Manson either. It is my opinion that he is the way he is just to get a rise out of people. To me he is fake.
Originally posted by MadSeason313
Saying slipknot and Manson don't have talent is very brave to say, considering they've sold millions of records, and have made names for themselves in the music industry.
Originally posted by snowflake_obsidian
There is a difference between using theatrical tactics to enhance your music and seeming to care more about your theatrics than your music in itself.
Originally posted by MadSeason313
I honestly belive Slipknot has a great deal of talent. Saying that don't is ridiculous. Saying that you don't like them, is alot more reasonable.
^^^^^agreed for the most part...'good' music is all up to the listener. if you like it, it's bitchen. if not then it sucks...for YOU....
Do you really think anyone wears a clown mask into the recording studio? I think not.
^^^^well, it's not a clown mask but buckethead wears his mask abd bucket in the studio.
here is a snip of buckethead, scott ian, and steve vai, in the STUDIO laying down the score for ghosts of mars......buckethead is wearing his mask.
buckethead comes in @ 3:02-4:16 and does a SICK run, in his mask.
see, this is only my opinion but i think that slipknot needs to rely on their schtick to 'sell' their stuff.
buckethead does it for the opposite reasons....
he wants it to be about the music....
so yeah, there is at least one person that goes into the studio in their mask(s)
Originally posted by MadSeason313
To me the "growl", and the # is what appeals me to the band. I believe the only reason why buckethead hid his appearance in the studio is because he knew it would be filmed.
^^^^^point was he does/did wear it in the studio....that was all.
you like it for the growl..i hate it cause the growl...thats what is rad about music...i don't have to listen to or like what you like and same goes for you....if you like it, it's bitchen...it's good music....
thats all there is to it.
Another good example of someone not giving an image, Janis Joplin.. *basks in Joplins tunes*
^^^^first, i love janice...there has not really been a woman with pipes like her since she died....i would say she had an image though....her image was that if a cig smoking, jack daniels swilling, don't give a crap rock chick...i think that kinda happened by default though....she did not create that image..
But my favorite era was the 90's. Back when seattle ruled the music scene. Back when there was a revolution of grunge, and when hair bands started to become a distant memory.
^^^^i was into that type for a long time. i was in highschool when that type of music was big..all the grunge stuff.
once i started playing guitar and studying music theory, my musical tastes did an about face....my ear is different now....
now that i understand music, i hear it differently. i don't know how to explain it.
Don't get me wrong, I like alot of 80' tunes, but alot of the artists just cared about sex, drugs, and "rock and roll".
^^^^imo, for the most part, the big hair, 80's 'glam rock' blows balls. i hate it...'most of it'...i mean, there was some killer notes put out in the 80's. frank was active in the 80's. my favorite zappa tune came out in the 80's but the 80's rock groups were in their own class. the huge hair. the makeup. the huge arenas......just not for me.
Originally posted by MadSeason313
Give me an example of someone who cares more of their image, and back it up with a solid source. Then perhaps, this debate will come to an end.