It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Drzava
FIRST, IS THERE any proof that we are all connected together?
The outer world is called maya, meaning illusion, and is thought of as God's dream or God's dance. That is, God creates it, but it has no reality of its own. Our individual egos they call jivatman, which means individual souls. But they, too, are something of an illusion. We are all actually extensions of the one and only Atman, or God, who allows bits of himself to forget his identity, to become apparently separate and independent, to become us. But we never truly are separate. When we die, we wake up and realize who we were from the beginning: God.
When we dream or meditate, we sink into our personal unconscious, coming closer and closer to our true selves, the collective unconscious. It is in states like this that we are especially open to "communications" from other egos. Synchronicity makes Jung's theory one of the rare ones that is not only compatible with parapsychological phenomena, but actually tries to explain them!
I agree. but i like to look at the logical explanations first and i still think when it comes to food some degree of it has to do with other factors
Originally posted by banyan
I agree with other posters on here in saying that you cannot totally credit the concept of global consciousness to people wanting food or coming in at the same time. Waking Life, touches on global consciousness a little. Check it out.
Originally posted by dionysius9
I think the world is on a threshold. Each human acts like an individual brain cell - a component of a larger mind. A billion more people and the collective IQ of humanity will reach the point that we as a whole will realize that there is nothing to be gained from warfare that you don't lose many times over compared to working together.
Originally posted by cpdaman
well if there was any validity to this, you would think those that profit from war would be threatened by rising populations would u not?
And like any succesful group and or "business" trying to protect their profits they would come out with a strong strategic plan to counter these threats and in ways that would make these counter strategy's hidden from public view or somehow turn them around as helpless tradgedy's (Aids, other diseases, etc ?)
I mean i would venture to guess some business/groups (If there "lives" depended) on it would somehow rationalize it to themselves that the ends (deaths of third worlder's and those that are not the "fittest" justify the means (which is their leadership ....in overseeing the general population to ensure some structure and stability to society (which in their warped logic is worth more lives i.e their leadership saves more lives, than the collateral effects of which kill
combine this with a beleif that 95 percent need to be told what to believe (by the 5%) this would give them the rationale to stretch and bend the truth, (reported thru various media) wether they believe you couldn't handle it, and/ or in order to keep a self perpetuating system going strong.
just brainstorming aloud
Originally posted by LDragonFire
Humans seem to be connected on some unknown level. I’m not sure what to call it and I’m not sure if science has a name for it. But all of humanity seems to be wired together.
And the greatest good you can do is to bring back a new idea, because our world is endangered by the absence of good ideas. Our world is in crisis because of the absence of consciousness.
Terence McKenna
Originally posted by MikeboydUS
Here's my take from the reserach I've done.
One:
Our Consciousness involves Quantum Entanglement in our minds. Sir Roger Penrose has been one of the biggest supporters of this idea.
Sir Roger Penrose is an English mathematical physicist and Emeritus Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics at the Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford. So he's not some quack. Essentially the human mind is a Quantum Computer.
Article on the mind and quantum computation
www.quantumconsciousness.org...
Originally posted by GeeGee
Intersting. However, is that link not working for anyone else? I clicked it and it froze my browser.
Anyway, Michio Kaku is another great physicist who believes we're all connected. Problem with this theory is it is very controversial, it will take a very long time for it to become mainstream friendly. Most scientists right now believe consciousness is created in the brain, but as Dean Radin quotes Alan Wallace here:
youtube.com...
"Despite centuries of modern philosophical and scientific research into the nature of mind, at present there is no technology that can detect the presence or absence of any kind of consciousness. Strictly speaking, at present there is no scientific evidence even for the existence of consciousness. All the direct evidence we have consists of non-scientific, first person accounts of being conscious."
With that said, I think we should keep an open mind as to what consciousness really is.
Originally posted by MikeboydUS
Do you have Adobe reader? Its a PDF article.
Michio Kaku is another of my favorite authors.
Thats true many phenomena involving the mind or consciousness can't really be verified or denied. How about dreams, nightmares, ideas, inspiration, thought, intuition, deja vu, and empathy? Science is completely dependent on the subject for information. We can speculate and ponder why and how with potential factors, but we have no concrete evidence to prove dreams even happen.
Originally posted by drflux
is this why i can "sense" people when they look at me? or when i look at someone and think about them they turn? i tried to explain this to some people that i know but they think im crazy.
Originally posted by drflux
is this why i can "sense" people when they look at me? or when i look at someone and think about them they turn? i tried to explain this to some people that i know but they think im crazy.
i dont know/think that im right but how possible would it be if the collective conciousness was a dimension?
Originally posted by Vanitas
I take it you are not familiar with Rupert Sheldrake's research?
Google him up - you'll see... ; )