It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
reply to post by thisguyrighthere
have you ever heard of someone protected by a gun?
i'm sure you haven't because a gun can only do two things: wound or kill
we shouldn't need weapons in this day and age. we should have grown out of such idiotic primitive behavior by now.
and there is clearly an alternative to such idiocy, as we can see with nations like norway and sweden, which have lower crime rates and lower gun ownership rates...
Originally posted by slackerwire
Wow, what is wrong with you? Seriously. I mean is it retardation or a healthy drug habit?
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
reply to post by thisguyrighthere
you missed my point... you can't protect with a gun
it harms
that's all it does.
someone has to either be injured severely or die (which is not that uncommon with the use of guns in self-defense)
the problem isn't overcrowding in prisons, the problem is that our culture is corrosive.
we need a society without guns, not because they aren't available, but because nobody sees a need for them.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
clearly the problem lies in the person that can't muster up anything save for a personal attack instead of any sort of argument.
Originally posted by slackerwire
It's obvious facts, intelligence and common sense dont work with you, so I was curious to see if there was a problem of some sort.
Norway, with the highest gun ownership rate in Western Europe, has the lowest murder rate—far below England's. Source
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
two personal attacks in one thread...
looks like you didn't get the message with that warn
when people have no argument, they always go for a personal attack.
Originally posted by slackerwire
I could drown you in facts,stats, and historical precedent, but what would it change? Nothing. You already dislike firearms.
Fact: The 2nd Amendment as well as other writings from the Founding Fathers show that they wanted the PEOPLE to be armed with whatever would be necessary to overthrow a tyrannical government.
Fact: The 2nd Amendment's first part (the well regulated militia clause) is DEPENDENT upon the following phrase: The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".
Fact: Even the Dept of Justice recognizes that the 2nd confers an individual right, not a collective one.
Fact: States with little or no gun restrictions have lower crime rates than those with strict gun control laws on the books.
Need I go on?
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
what about nations like my perennial example of norway?
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Looking at what causes crime? Because nobody has ever done that or is currently doing that or will continue to do that? The answer to what is causing crime is widely varied from case to case, victim to victim and perpetrator to perpetrator that there is no one answer. There is no neat summary listing a few steps to follow. There is a whole world out there and no one case is exactly like another.
Why are there more religious persons in prison than non? Well, for one, nothing says "I'm good for early release" like turning to "god."
For two, you need to group up if you expect to fair well in prison. What are organized faiths if not simple ways to group up?
For three, I'm sure the cases who are honestly remorseful for their actions seek some sort of guilt-relief or reassurance that somebody somewhere will forgive them and hence find "religion."
For four, joining a fringe religion can help you justify your behavior by claiming disenfranchisement.
For five, there are many militant "religious" tangents in the prison system. What better way to satisfy the urge of revenge against your captors than to join, if only symbolically, a movement of "resistance?"
There are plenty of reasons.
I agree that better education and personal responsibility would do greatly to reduce crime. For starters we can abolish government education, government handouts that ease the fall of failure, any and all excuses from race to orientation to one's physical weight and height. We have a million excuses floating around why people don't have to be personally responsible for their actions.
Hey! You might like this:
Norway, with the highest gun ownership rate in Western Europe, has the lowest murder rate—far below England's. Source
Well, that's both Norway and Sweden with high rates of gun ownership. Any more countries you want to throw out there?
Here's more about Norway, Sweden and guns if you care:
Harvard Journal Study
The complete study
i'll disagree with this until we can see numbers to suggest it's true.
atheists and the nonreligious can be just as remorseful....
religion doesn't equal remorse.
weak argument, there's a lack of fringe religions.
oh... but this doesn't account for the lack of these fringe religious elements in the mainstream prison population
but they don't account for why there aren't many atheists going IN to prisons. sure, more atheists go in to prison than come out... but less atheists go in to begin with.
and then you post something about Norway and Sweden two democratic socialist paradises?
contradictory arguments will get you nowhere...
government education can be something marvelous, the problem is in how the system is set up as opposed to the fact that it's governmental.
interesting
however, correlation isn't causation
i could bring up that the two nations also have the highest rates of atheism in the continent (Sweden is also #1 in the world and Norway #3)
hmm...
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
what about nations like my perennial example of norway?
Look back 3 posts. Answered and then some.
[edit on 5-12-2007 by thisguyrighthere]