What will historians think of Bush and Cheny?

Historians will think Bush was a thief that stole the election and became an officeholder that tried to leave out even with the stolen country's conscious and unconscious and subconscious approval.

Bush will have gone into hiding with top government help and be reported as a missing person. Conspiracy theorist will think the government assassinated him and left no body as evidence.

And it'll be that top government orders had Cheny's death faked with the whole heart attack thing as being of trickery all along.

First you got to understand that Bush and Cheny will be seen as once out of power as men that can be wanted then.

And the 44th pres would have either known about it or been kept in the dark about it.

reply to post by Mabus


You posted your blather in the wrong forum. abovepolitics.com is where this sort of drivel belongs. You are dismissed.

True historians will see them as they are. Powerful, greedy men who wear the blood of thousands of dead on their hands.

However, the term historian is dictated by our society. the same society that creates the criteria deemed fit for our schools. Thus, these historians will paint them as heros who defended freedom. It's disgusting but the people don't seem to have much power these days, they're more like slaves working vigorously to push the agenda.

What historians? There won't be any.