It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NGC2736
reply to post by spikedmilk
OK, I caught you! That last image with all the colors is mislabeled.
That's "The Crowning of the Magi", a lost Picasso worth millions.
Originally posted by spikedmilk
and one of my new favorites...from Luna 7 (russian rover)...yeah its hard to look at but once you get a feel for it....
Originally posted by PrplHrt
Oh poo. Everyone seems determined to kill the dream.
Originally posted by jedimiller
I've examined the footage. having taking numerous photography courses I can safely come to the conclusion that it's a dirty lens. perhaps a hair or fabric got into the developing and made it out to look that way. could also be a burn in the film, but it's a micro defect. Cameras and film get beaten up in space and function funny in space. hope this helps.
Originally posted by jedimiller
I've examined the footage. having taking numerous photography courses I can safely come to the conclusion that it's a dirty lens. perhaps a hair or fabric got into the developing and made it out to look that way. could also be a burn in the film, but it's a micro defect. Cameras and film get beaten up in space and function funny in space. hope this helps.
Originally posted by x-phile
If there is no atmosphere on the Moon, how can something "blow" in the wind.
Originally posted by patriot jim
But then the NASA KodaK color pics are so breath-taking- perfect- so what gives here? jedi
Originally posted by jedimiller
Kodak makes good color prints. Problem, NASA wasn't using color prints back then. and they didn't have very good equipment back then. We are talking about the 60's. it all goes down to how careful you are while developing the film in the dark room.
We know that Ken Johnston, who worked at the Lunar Receiving Laboratory in Houston during Apollo, witnessed the photo retouching and airbrushing of first generation lunar photography in order to cover up anomalous data. Fortunately, they didn’t cover it all. From what we’ve now discovered on the far side photography, its stunning to speculate what else might be found there considering that by 1972, only 20% of the entire Moon had supposedly been photographed.
www.lunaranomalies.com...