It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
What proof do we have that Boger, Walter, anyone in that describes a 'bank' means it in the same way you do? As I see it the word alone could mean a turn or just an actual bank, and I'd need other clues like "it banked right, turning from northeast to east..." etc.
We don't believe Walter due to many fatal contradictions in his account. Boger describes it perfectly. Please don't lump the two together as if we give them the same level of credence.
No but neither would it change in a fraction of a second from what he had seen earlier. Where does he say it stopped 'banking' and straightened out? How do we know it wasn't still doing that behind the trees? Did it level its wings, pull up and fly over behind the trees?
Because that is not what he describes and we know the plane was on the north side of the citgo but we also know that [...]
So for every instance you say Walter's report of a bank contradicts the official story I call bull. Until you get him to explain he MEANS a right turn, and that graceful means extreme, with left wing very high.
Read his words. It is quite clear this is what he means.
The fact that you refuse his own words isn't my problem.
So if you accept his "graceful bank" description as valid you must accept that it contradicts the official story.
He is clearly describing a plane off in the distance coming out of a turn and "lining up it's sights". How you can construe that to be a 2 second event with a slight tilt at the last moment I will never know.
We talked to him in person. You didn't.
His brain would not have ANY time to think the plane was normal traffic on the official flight path.
And since we're keeping this in the vs. thread, I have a general Q for you. You mentioned Paik's earlier interview w/Pickering present. I hear Robert Turcios gave an earlier recorded interview before his video-taped one. Is this available for the public to hear? Do you have a copy you can share in the interests further verification of your scientific and open process?
The wisdom lies not in assuming that the official story is true: If anyone can look at all the combined ' inexplicable anomalies ' that are associated with just the Pentagon ' attack ' and still have any doubt about whether or not a huge passenger jet hit the Pentagon, then in my opinion that person does not have the requisite skills of critical thinking and the ability to discern odds very well, and is thus an unreliable commentator.
In addition to the witness statements, we also have NO jet parts displayed outside or inside the Pentagon. NO suitcases, no bodies of the passengers being collected ( no bodies were collected except for those that were in the Pentagon before the explosions. NO HOLES from the two massive engines, and no photos that show two engine parts. This goes on and on ad nauseum until no sound mind could possible swallow the fairy tale that is the official story.
So, Mr. Larson, next time you make grand asusmptions that defy ALL logic, be honest enough to admit that the odds are so far from being with you that they are beyond your horizon and past the limits of believability. To believe the officla story is like believing a kid that has his hand caught in the cookie jar and stand there and says: " What cookie jar ?" Bold lies and insane imaginings may convince those unwilling to look beyond their noses, but no one else.
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
The rest of your post isn't worth my time.
I have a new full feature presentation to finish up.
I'm done with you.
"No, I'm not threatened, just strangely obsessed with debunking you claims....."
[...]
"I'm just doing this because ___ fill it in yourself since you can't ever know anyway. Selfish reasons to be sure, my own ego."
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
Just a little update on the ongoing "debate" between CIT/PFT and Caustic Logic.
In fact he has even admitted on his blog that he has an ego driven "obsession" with us!
[...] from the comments section of this blog.
Pretty crazy isn't it?
ANYTHING that greasy haired fool puts on the net is fair game.
He is bankrupt on trying to counter the overwhelming evidence we have proving his precious 757 impact story false so he is resorting to quote mining in a sad effort to focus on you personally and interpret your motives.
At any rate, while virtually ignoring the plethora of new evidence we have provided
he has chosen to continue to make the case that the citgo witnesses are all deep cover planted disinfo operatives who deliberately LIED about what they saw on camera in order to throw people off track from the......ummm.......official story?
Of course his theory requires heliport control tower employee Sean Boger, courier Levi Stephens, Edward Paik, and even Terry Morin up at the Navy Annex to ALL be in on this little conspiracy within a conspiracy.
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
So for every instance you say Walter's report of a bank contradicts the official story I call bull. Until you get him to explain he MEANS a right turn, and that graceful means extreme, with left wing very high.
"If you can do it, can you walk through the wall for us now, on camera?"
I can't right now, no"
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
Will you now concede that the bank Mike Walter describes contradicts the official story with his banking claim?
As soon as you acknowledge this indicates a mild left bank.
So which is it? Do hand/arm gestures count or not? One comes from one of your own groundreaking witnesses, the other from a plated liar
"I do not believe or trust Mike Walter for a single second and we have plenty of evidence to show deliberate contradictions in his account. [...] He could not see the underbelly. He did not see the underbelly. He could not have seen the underbelly or a bank on the official flight path as well. This is just ONE of many fatal contradictions demonstrating how Mike Walter's statements are not truthful."
Would he be able to see the underbelly if it banked right like him and Boger describe?
Why do I bother? You're right, this isn't fun. This is getting really really old. I'm getting tired more than angry any more.
Maintain Vigilance and Calm
Originally posted by mirageofdeceit
reply to post by Caustic Logic
Maintain Vigilance and Calm
Moving on.....
The guy in the CIT video depicts a slight bank, quite a way away, whilst the other guy suggests it is a steeper left turn, closer in.