It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Lear a CIA agent?

page: 5
2
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 15 2007 @ 10:46 AM
link   
reply to post by buddhasystem
 


Buddha,

while I do agree that it is not at all hard to regard a claim as invalid that is not why I am here I am only here to observe and take a break from the world, I have nothing to prove or disprove either way just relaxing and really shaking my head most days at the stupidity of others (no offense anyone)..

You appear to have a much better and more in depth education than I (mostly self taught) so typically I choose not to make the decisions myself but instead hire a person or team like yourself when needed to make the decisions for me unless like you say there is a blatant disregard for information that has been presented but again as far as this forum is concerned I have no bias either way and again mostly just reading and smiling silently to myself..

At any rate I have enjoyed the exchange of viewpoints and unlike others I think your people skills are just fine (some people just can't handle debate)
so thanks again for the exchange of views and I look forward to more in the future..

Respectfully,
GEO



posted on Nov, 16 2007 @ 04:19 AM
link   
Lear a CIA Agent
Why of course he is, I bet he just loves to be ridiculed every day for his beliefs.
I find it hard to swallow some of the things he states, but he has more contacts to people in the 'know', so it dosn't come as a surprise that even a John Lear may fall for a story concockted up by a 'real' disinformation Agent.
One thing I think every one agrees on, that man has earned his own forum here.


Keep the 'BS' comming John..I love it



posted on Nov, 16 2007 @ 08:12 AM
link   
Btw. The whole premise wrong.

JL was a pilot for a company, which had a CIA contract.

So, to recap, he was an employee of a CIA subcontractor.

It's the same as being a guy employed by XYZ Co. making widgets for NASA, and having people claim you're an astronaut.
Silly.
If it has been proven he was an actual paid employee of CIA I missed it.
Please enlighten.



posted on Nov, 16 2007 @ 03:02 PM
link   
I dont know if he is a agent or not, but if whatever he claims atleast 5% of it is true, he sure has got good backing and blessing from some top people. Otherwise he will be ripped and teared apart for disclosures he is making.

Wharever it is I like to read his posts...



posted on Nov, 18 2007 @ 11:25 AM
link   
I have a question, what that change if he is in fact a cia agent?
If he was a cia agent then all he said about extraterrestrial being/craft moon etc... could just be more credible and we would have the best evidence in our hand.
Also, there is more and more "high ranked" people who make their own disclosure, from soldiers to astronaut, and we( all of us ) say finaly more evidence is starting to show up, so it doesn't work for a so-called cia agent????
And again if he is a cia agent and he is putting us on the wrong way, you have to remember that we can find the true in the lie so as we say " you have to learn to read between the sentence", i hope you know this expression!?

Cia agent or not i don't care, he spare with us his ideas, so it's up to you to believe him or not.

Good job John, and continue that way.



posted on Nov, 18 2007 @ 11:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by ufopunx
I have a question, what that change if he is in fact a cia agent?
If he was a cia agent then all he said about extraterrestrial being/craft moon etc... could just be more credible and we would have the best evidence in our hand.


With all due respect, sir, you got it wrong, its the other way around. Since a fair amount of John has said contradicts hard facts, it's just plain impossible that such "info" came from a serious agency of any kind, much less the CIA. I speculate, therefore, that there is an agenda here that's quite different -- to undermine the credibility of alternative studies related to all things extraterrestrial, and to drown the few precious interesting facts in a deluge of random weirdness.

Quite on topic for this board, I must say. It's a great conspiracy theory, isn't it?



posted on Nov, 18 2007 @ 11:33 AM
link   
reply to post by elevatedone
 


If it's not all hot air.



posted on Nov, 18 2007 @ 10:02 PM
link   
Maybe he is just an internet troll (and before the www, a BBS troll, like back in the paranet days) who keeps going because people still bite.



posted on Nov, 18 2007 @ 10:29 PM
link   
reply to post by plug_pray
 


Cooper, from what I've read and the material of his I've reviewed, successfully managed to burn nearly every bridge he had in the UFO community. Could be wrong, but that was the impression I ended up with after reviewing his work.

Seems to me that there came a point when he would have just had to leave the UFO community entirely. It seemed (again, seemed... I am open to correction) that by a certain point, he saw everyone in the UFO study community as either ill-informed or a "disinformation agent." This, of course, is utter non-sense, as there is always more to learn and not everyone is "evil" or there to provide smokescreens. When you destroy your house in one location, it is time to rebuild it in another. And his new house focused on the entirely human "New World Order." Oh, Willy.

You know, I should have used some of these conspiracy theories as excuses for why I didn't always have my homework completed in gradeschool. "I'm sorry, Mrs. Williams, but a little grey man ate it... and then pooed it out his skin because he didn't have a proper digestive tract."





top topics



 
2
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join