It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
It’s no secret that the dollar is on a downward spiral. Its value is dropping, and the Fed isn’t doing a whole lot to change that. As a result, a number of countries are considering a shift away from the dollar to preserve their assets. These are seven of the countries currently considering a move from the dollar, and how they’ll have an effect on its value and the US economy.
Obviously, an abandonment of the dollar is bad news for the currency. Simply put, as demand lessens, its value drops. Additionally, the revenue generated from the use of the dollar will be sorely missed if it’s lost. The dollar’s status as a cheaply-produced US export is a vital part of our economy. Losing this status could rock the financial lives of both Americans and the worldwide economy.
Originally posted by tankthinker
ya go candian dollar up to 1.10 today, woot
Originally posted by Solarskye
reply to post by Roland Deschain
Yeah and I bet that's exactly what everybody is waiting for. As soon as america is weak and to busy taking care of itself is when everybody will try to take over america and it's land. But if this does happen. Do you think anyone will come to our aid?
Originally posted by mentalempire
China won't do jack squat. An economist on NPR remarked that China can't afford to dump the dollar because America imports so much of their stuff and they've heavily invested in us. It was for this very reason that China backpedaled from their earlier remarks that they might dump the dollar.
Simple if you really understand how the U.S. goverment works.
There are two groups in control that sometimes agree and sometimes work against each other. They are the elected officials and the appointed officials (bureaucrats). You would think that since the bureaucrats are appointed by elected officials, they would always be in lock-step, but what happens is the many appointed officials end up staying over past the administration that appointed them. Only the top officials get changed. And there are so many of the retained bureacrats running so many programs that they are basically under no control. They end up setting policies and procedures with little or no oversight, so they are free to do things based on their own political agendas.
Ever wonder why things happen that make no sense given the current administration - Republican or democrat? How the "left wing nuts" have still been able to do all this with Bush in charge?
Now you know.