posted on Oct, 31 2007 @ 12:09 AM
the difference is that 9/11 conspiracy theories consist of a little more than a story.
I aren't allowed to do a one line post so now I will pad it out even though the above line is all that needed to be said.
9/11 has lots of valid points, videos, documentation, photographs, audio, official government questionable actions, all that support the inside job
angle.
So far all I have to go with for the lizardmen is David Icke's word, fuzzy youtube videos that prove nothing, a bad sounding b movie story, books
based on just linking anything to a lizard race by theory only and well to be honest a lot of claims that don't hold any water.
Oh and unhelpful supporters that rather than explain, educate, prove or reason will rather just get aggressive that basically we aren't gullible
enough to just take someones word on a far fetched story.
Why not put your money where your mouth is and prove they exist, that its real and shut all the sceptics up in one go?
Or are we to expect the same old excuse of 'if you cant disprove it then it means it must be real' which is the only argument ive heard so far.