It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
patriotsquestion911.com...
Senior Military, Intelligence, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials Question the 9/11 Commission Report
Many well known and respected senior U.S. military officers, intelligence services and law enforcement veterans, and government officials have expressed significant criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report or have made public statements that contradict the Report. Several even allege government complicity in the terrible acts of 9/11. This website is a collection of their statements. It is not an organization and it should be made clear that none of these individuals are affiliated with this website.
Listed below are statements by more than 110 of these senior officials. Their collective voices give credibility to the claim that the 9/11 Commission Report is tragically flawed. These individuals cannot be simply dismissed as irresponsible believers in some 9/11 conspiracy theory. Their sincere concern, backed by their decades of service to their country, demonstrate that criticism of the Report is not irresponsible, illogical, nor disloyal, per se. In fact, it can be just the opposite.
Originally posted by Boone 870
reply to post by rapturas
My opinion is that it stinks.
They use a person who was killed during the attacks to promote the theory.
Frank A DeMartini
Frank A. DeMartini – WTC victim. Architect and WTC Construction Manager, North Tower, 88th floor. Demartini first worked at the World Trade Center when Leslie E. Robertson Associates hired him to assess damage from the terrorist truck bombing in 1993.
* Video interview 1/25/01: "The [Twin Tower] building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door. This intense grid and the jet-plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting." video.google.com...
* Editor's note: The Boeing 767-200s that impacted the Twin Towers on 9/11 were only slightly larger than 707s and DC 8s, the types of jetliners whose impacts the World Trade Center's designers anticipated. The maximum takeoff weight of the 707 is 15% less than the 767.
* Bio: www.legacy.com...
[/q]
And besides, you are saying the whole website stinks based on one person being killed and his opinions being used?
Maybe if he were still alive he would be reiterating his points? and lets be honest, the site included the www.legacy.com... so its not like they are hiding anything, right?
Originally posted by jpm1602
The whole Silverstein billion dollar insurance policy months before, and the millions in put options on the airline industry 'days' before throws a big ol' monkey wrench into the scheme of things.
Trade Center Financing on Shaky Ground
In its court papers, Swiss Re shows how Silverstein first tried to buy just $1.5 billion in property damage and business-interruption coverage. When his lenders objected, he discussed buying a $5 billion policy. Ultimately, he settled on the $3.5 billion figure, which was less than the likely cost of rebuilding.
Originally posted by Boone 870
reply to post by rapturas
Maybe if he was still alive he could be reiterating his points or maybe not.
That's just one person. How many more dead patriots are there questioning 9/11?
originally posted by rapturas
Im not sure why you discredit the whole site based on the use of one persons opinion that is unfortunately dead now. Its not like they are saying Frank stated 9/11 was an inside job before it happened; and why should they leave him off their site? it still pertains to the WTC's does it not? he was a victim, no?
Originally posted by Boone 870
originally posted by rapturas
Im not sure why you discredit the whole site based on the use of one persons opinion that is unfortunately dead now. Its not like they are saying Frank stated 9/11 was an inside job before it happened; and why should they leave him off their site? it still pertains to the WTC's does it not? he was a victim, no?
Look at the title of the web site, "patriotsquestion911", how could he question 911 if he was killed on 9/11?
I think that it is disgusting to use the tragedy of one man to promote a silly theory.
That is my opinion!
I was watching Flight of the Condor last night. It's from the 80s and shows Fay Dunaway going into the twin towers to the CIA office. In the end they find that the CIA killed a bunch of people for middle east oil. I think the motives of the military industrial complex are much more plausable than Bin ladin's motives.