first REAL pic of the AROURA ?

i was searching around on google and found this it really looks like the aroura but (well what the aroura is sopose to look like) so i think this is real but how did it get out?
it says it is the tr3-b but it looks like the aroura


that is the tr3-b (cgi)



[edit on 28-10-2007 by xbrendanx]

[edit on 28-10-2007 by Jbird]

Wow sorry to be so blunt but i think i once saw that picture on a cereal box.

Regard's
Lee

[edit on 28-10-2007 by h3akalee]

what cereal box?

So this looks like the Aroura? Can you post the photo of the Aroura so we can also compare?

Originally posted by xbrendanx

that is the tr3-b (cgi)

[edit on 28-10-2007 by xbrendanx]

"first REAL pic of the Aroura"(sic)

Was this MEANT to be a joke? It's CGI AND real??? How does that work?

Please tell me you aren't being serious in this thread.


Jasn

Well, the BACKGROUND is real, and the rest is... well... phony.
And I think it was on a box of fruit loops.

Here is the maiden test flight of the Aurora prototype.





Mod Edit: Image Hotlinking – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 28/10/2007 by Mirthful Me]

Originally posted by mek12
So this looks like the Aroura? Can you post the photo of the Aroura so we can also compare?

if you can read it says it looks like what the aroura is sopose to look like

Originally posted by xbrendanx

Originally posted by mek12
So this looks like the Aroura? Can you post the photo of the Aroura so we can also compare?

if you can read it says it looks like what the aroura is sopose to look like

I can not only read, I can spell.

As far as your headline : first REAL pic of the AROURA
You really need a question mark on a title like that.

This statement invites humor:

i so i think this is real but how did it get out?
it says it is the tr3-b but it looks like the aroura
Can you read?

The image you linked to can be seen below. It is not the Aurora, nor is it the TR-3B (also a popular conspiracy story myth).

The image actually was an artists rendering of what the B-2 or the then Advanced Technology Bomber (ATB) looked like before it was unveiled to the public.
The rendering first graced the cover of Discover Magazine's February 1986 issue, as seen below.

There really are things that "go bump in the night" in military aerospace, this just isn't a picture of such an animal.




^ and if anyone wants to know "why do we have orgasms" as the magazine cover asks, just U2U me, I'll explain everything to you.
Bios

[edit on 10/28/2007 by bios]

Originally posted by bios
The image you linked to can be seen below. It is not the Aurora, nor is it the TR-3B (also a popular conspiracy story myth).

The image actually was an artists rendering of what the B-2 or the then Advanced Technology Bomber (ATB) looked like before it was unveiled to the public.
The rendering first graced the cover of Discover Magazine's February 1986 issue, as seen below.

There really are things that "go bump in the night" in military aerospace, this just isn't a picture of such an animal.


^ and if anyone wants to know "why do we have orgasms" as the magazine cover asks, just U2U me, I'll explain everything to you.

Bios

[edit on 10/28/2007 by bios]

they are 2 different views look the one you poasted is from a lower angle i dont think you can change this in photo shop but i might be wrong
and if this is real case closed
thanks bois but i am sad it isnt the aroura

edit: what ever happend to that plane? did they fix it?

[edit on 28-10-2007 by xbrendanx]

I recommend you changed the title of this thread, it's very misleading.

The magazine articel has me very intrigued. Can someone contact Discover Magazine and ask for a reprint of that magazine, that way someone can read the actual article and tell us what is said? I'd really like to get my hands on it.

The image, however, does seem to lack many features that the Aurora (correct spelling) is said to have, for example, a cockpit and rear ailerons.

This could be a protoype for a UAV of some kind... maybe if I had the artilce I could make a better guess!

TheRanchMan

Originally posted by xbrendanx

they are 2 different views look the one you poasted is from a lower angle i dont think you can change this in photo shop but i might be wrong
and if this is real case closed
thanks bois but i am sad it isnt the aroura

edit: what ever happend to that plane? did they fix it?

[edit on 28-10-2007 by xbrendanx]

It took me about 2 minutes in Photoshop to match the skew and perspective of the fake pic by using the original Discover Magazine pic.



it is the same image - only manipulated.

Bios

[edit on 10/28/2007 by bios]

Originally posted by bios

Originally posted by xbrendanx

they are 2 different views look the one you poasted is from a lower angle i dont think you can change this in photo shop but i might be wrong
and if this is real case closed
thanks bois but i am sad it isnt the aroura

edit: what ever happend to that plane? did they fix it?

[edit on 28-10-2007 by xbrendanx]

It took me about 2 minutes in Photoshop to match the skew and perspective of the fake pic by using the original Discover Magazine pic.

it is the same image - only manipulated.

Bios

[edit on 10/28/2007 by bios]

ok i guess this thread is done it fooled me thanks again bios

reply to post by bios


It looks like the only things you forgot to do bios were to turn it sepia and to mirror the image (look at the people around the plane).

reply to post by bios


lol awesome images bios I actually have them featured in my debunked section here on the forum.

Here is the thread which helps out with a number of questions and more that have been raised. If we need to clarify things even more I'll add another post to the thread.
www.abovetopsecret.com...


[edit on 22/08/06 by Canada_EH]

reply to post by xbrendanx


Well here is a link with the picture and some text. Anyone able to read the discription.
www.edicolaweb.net...

Forget the Aurora!!!

I just want to see the size of that screwdriver that is used for the top of that thing!!!

LMAO

[edit on 28-10-2007 by greeneyedleo]

I believe that the original picture is in fact desinged to be used underneath a notebook to ensure it does not overheat.

Unless the USAF has plan to enlarge it, make it airbourne and use to cool the Arctic, i see very little use in practice.

Jensy

reply to post by greeneyedleo


lol I think you 2 nailed it. People will try and profit off of anything eh? Anyways I guess it would make sence to add it to the debunked thread eh?