reply to post by Scalamander
I recall in the British Museum my dad asked a curator how much they had in storage and the curator replied "as much is on public display and
more".
FURTHERMORE
I recall how certain controversial artifacts have gotten either "mislabeled" or "lost" when going thru the cataloging process at the BM.
"In September 1872 a British engineer, Waynman Dixon, working in Egypt was requested by Piazzi Smyth, the Astronomer Royal of Scotland, to undertake
for him some casual exploration inside the Great Pyramid [7]. It was around this time that Dixon discovered the openings of the two shafts on the
south and north walls of the Queen's Chamber. In the horizontal section of the shafts that leads into the chamber, Dixon found three small relics: a
small bronze hook; a portion of 'cedar-like' wood, and a granite ball [8]. The relics were packed in a wooden cigar box and taken to England by John
Dixon, Waynman's older brother, also an engineer. They were mailed to Piazzi Smyth who recorded them in his diary, then returned to John Dixon who
eventually arranged for the publications of articles and drawings of the relics for the science journal Nature and the popular London paper The
Graphic [9]. The 'Dixon Relics' then mysteriously disappeared. Astonishingly, although the discovery of the shafts of the Queen's Chamber by
Waynman Dixon was reported by Flinders-Petrie in 1881 and by Dr. I.E.S. Edwards in 1946 and through the years by numerous other pyramid specialists,
the 'Dixon' relics were never mentioned and their existence apparently forgotten [10]. The only person, as far as I can make out, who mentioned
these relics after they were published in December 1872 in Nature and The Graphic was the astronomer Piazzi Smyth (see below).
Here is, in fact, what actually happened to the relics after December 1872: exactly a century later, in 1972, a certain Mrs. Elizabeth Porteous living
in Hounslow near London, was reminded (apparently by the excitement generated by the Tutankhamun Exhibition at the time) that her great grandfather,
John Dixon, had left in the family a cigar box with relics inside them found in the Great Pyramid which she had inherited in 1970, after the death of
her father. Mrs. Porteous then took the relics, still in the original cigar box, to the British Museum. They were registered by Mr. Ian Shore, then
the assistant of Dr. I.E.S. Edwards, the curator of the Egyptian Antiquities Department. However, probably because of the distraction caused by the
Tutankhamun Exhibition, the Dixon Relics were stored and forgotten. In September 1993, having come across a comment by Piazzi Smyth in one of his
books [11], I decided to find out where the Dixon Relics were. I contacted Dr. I.E.S. Edwards (then retired at Oxford) and also Dr. Carol Andrews and
Dr. A.J. Spencer at the British Museum, but neither seemed to have heard of these relics. Eventually, with the help of Dr. Mary Bruck, the biographer
of Piazzi Smyth [12], I traced Piazzi Smyth's personal diary at the Edinburgh Observatory and found his entry on the relics dated 26 November 1872,
as well as private letters he had received from John Dixon at the time. Through these documents I then traced the articles published in Nature and The
Graphic. While still searching for the relics, it was recalled that it was John Dixon who, in 1872-6, had arranged for the transport of the Thotmoses
III obelisk (Cleopatra's Needle) to London's Victoria Embankment and, more importantly, that underneath its pedestal Dixon had ceremoniously
embedded various relics including a cigar box! Naturally many of us began to suspect that this item might have been the very same cigar box which
contained the ancient relics found in the shafts of the Queen's Chamber of the Great Pyramid. Fortunately this was not to be the case. I decided at
that stage of the search to publish a full page article in the British newspaper, The Independent [13], in the hope that someone might remember the
whereabouts of the Dixon Relics. The ploy worked. Ian Shore, who had registered the relics back in 1972 at the British Museum, read the article and
remembered them being donated by Mrs. Porteous. He promptly informed Dr. Edwards who in turn contacted Dr. Vivian Davies, the curator of the Egyptian
Antiquities at the British Museum. A search was called and the relics were 're-discovered' at the British Museum in the second week of December 1993
[14]. Unfortunately the small piece of 'cedar-like' wood was missing, and thus no Carbon 14 dating was possible. The relics are now displayed at the
British Museum's Egyptian section."
OK, so we don't have any "proof" of foul play, but I still do think this happening was odd.
robertbauval.co.uk...
[edit on 25-10-2007 by uberarcanist]