It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Copernicus
What if its approaching us and they lie about the orbit? Is it possible for private astronomers to calculate its orbit to verify what NASA says?
Based on orbital computations and luminosity before the comet's 2007 outburst, its nuclear diameter is estimated at 3.4 km [8]. In late October 2007 the diameter of its coma increased from 3.3 arcminutes to over 13 arcminutes[9], about half the diameter that the Moon subtends in the sky.
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by fiftyfifty
And how the hell can they call something 7 times the size of jupiter a comet?!
Originally posted by Hal9000 So just to clarify, the comet nucleus is not the size of the Moon, just the coma which is made of gas and vapor.
Originally posted by disownedsky
What makes you think that NASA is saying that? There are lots of non-NASA astronomers world wide observing this comet and trying to understand its eruption.
I don't think there's any reasonable doubt left that it is a comet.
Originally posted by stellawayten
Are yall sure that it isn't coming towards us?
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Hal9000 So just to clarify, the comet nucleus is not the size of the Moon, just the coma which is made of gas and vapor.
NASA says 7 times the size of Jupiter not Moon (just to clarify )
How big is Jupiter? Its mostly made of 'gas and vapor' too as I recall?
Originally posted by Hal9000
I was referring to the APPARENT size of the coma in the sky, which most are doing right now.
Come on zorgon, I know you are smarter than this, you are just trying to stir people up.
Originally posted by disownedsky
...(probably ice)
...scientific results should start rolling in soon.
And no, it's not going to hit the Earth.
And hell if the world is going to end... I would go out with a bang!
Originally posted by zorgon
Come on zorgon, I know you are smarter than this, you are just trying to stir people up.
LOL no not really, though many here have accused me of 'tabloid tactics'... I just hate the selective reporting... gas or not its huge, its unusual and if I wasn't on ATS or NASA's email list I would never have heard of it. I am sure it's 'no big deal' to astronomers...
Besides like it or not sensationalism keeps the marks coming in... boring scientific reports bore most people to sleep
Now then where are those reports explaining this phenomena? Al I have heard from 'astronomers' is could be, may be, probably etc...