Creative states of consciousness are impossible to control. That impacts the installed societal boundaries that guide wealth to specific places. The
boundaries are defined by pseudo-rational consumerism and are sheathed in faux skins of corporate creative rights and controls. The true creatives
they employ operate, barred any vision, under the floors of the powerful institutional controllers, who see markets in everything and demand them all.
Creators, hired by the visionless and policy-sequestered in the underbellies of the media institutions, poisoned by their own fear for their careers
and whose works are force channeled through heavily lobbied paths of legal profit by the corporate controlling entities, enhanced by costly marketing
positions and field advantage, to saturate media and protect their markets by raising the entry fees for general (so called unprofessional)
competition, effectively economically outclassing them. (taking a breath) That has changed dramatically in the last two decades with innovation for
the common person.
The greatest blow to these giant conglomerate entities was the personal desktop computing industry that allowed the creative to produce at a
comparable production value, utilizing desktop sound technology and then video, Flash, interactive and more recently for social collaborative
networking, including all the above. Garage bands and visual creatives dilute markets, and the large media detest such competition because it cannot
be controlled easily. Hence the countering publicity campaigns rattled off by operatives like Keen.
Individuals like this are the intellectual lap dogs of an industry who want to control all their markets and acquire any emerging opportunities for
additional profits. He was educated and acquired in spirit by this industry. Should we be surprised?
We are in a consumer-based society. We are the Eveready batteries they want to cull for profits, (the Matrix?) and if we are not umbilically
connected to them we are told we are not significant and are therefore a danger to that society. This dark polarizing consciousness is at the center
of all the structures we are told we cannot survive without. We know, the many of us who dare to peek out of the cubical, that we are significant and
that we all have access to much more than we are told as creatives and brilliant observers. Even as our very educational system still filters out the
creative in our children, by design, since the industrial revolution that needed gears for their factories and not independent thinkers. They want to
do the thinking (dictating agenda) for us.
"Most people today think they belong to a species that can be master of its destiny. This is faith, not science. We do not speak of a time when
whales or gorillas will be masters of their destinies. Why then humans."
These are the deadening musings of the mechanist elite. They abhor the balance of the vitalist message that we are more than meat computers. There
might be too many of us now for eco-sustainability, but that is due to the consciousness we are locked in for lack of creative input. We are more
profitable in numbers.
I was creative director for a Web 2.0 company from 02-06. 2.0 was a tag line for a change in the intent of the web for us. We wanted to educate,
inspire and empower individuals. We where minimalized by the very powers that that threatened. Our first attempt was cut short one week before
release by the dot com crash. Our second try was infiltrated by I believe dot-com-killer operatives after the mysterious sudden death of our CTO. We
where doing Google before Google existed, and eventually mimic’s took our ideas and with much more funding developed the concepts. We where starved
out of funding because our vision was balanced but put power in the individuals hands.
This guy is just another status-lubricated glorified gear with linear intellectual teeth.
We are more, and we will see this, despite the efforts to control our spirits.